Berkeley High School

Berkeley High on Newsweek’s list of top high schools

Berkeley High cafeteria.

Berkeley High School once again made Newsweek magazine’s list of the top American public high schools, but for the first time in four years its rating went down rather than up.

BHS was ranked 446 out of 1,600 schools in the 2010 report. In 2009, the high school was ranked 271, up from the 2008 ranking of 286.

The slip is interesting. Newsweek calculates its scores by taking the number of Advanced Placement and International Baccalaureate tests taken at the school and dividing it by the number of seniors to come up with an index rate. In 2010, this rate was 2.401, a drop from last year’s 2.728. (Read a full explanation of its ranking system.)

But 2009 was the first year Berkeley High offered IB tests, so one would think that rate would improve. It is possible, however, that students who in past years would have taken an AP test switched to taking IB tests. Then there wouldn’t be a jump in the number of high level tests taken by students.

Newsweek states that the ranking on the list is not as critical as its index rate. As more schools in the U.S. find out about the list and submit their statistics, it is common for other schools to slip in the rankings, said the magazine.

Berkeley Unified School District spokesman Mark Coplan said BHS’ ranking slip may have had more to do with other schools improving rather than Berkeley High getting worse.

“It’s not based on a lessening of progress at Berkeley High, but an acceleration elsewhere,” said Coplan.

Newsweek’s rankings are controversial because they look at just one small aspect of a school. The author, Jay Mathews, believes strongly in the merit of AP and IB classes. He thinks they are the best indicators of performance in college.

‘To send a student off to college without having had an AP, IB, or Cambridge course and test is like insisting that a child learn to ride a bike without ever taking off the training wheels,’ writes Mathews.

In December 2009, U.S. News and World Report compiled its own list of the best high schools in the U.S., using completely different assessment tools. Berkeley High did not even make that list.

But once again Berkeley High seniors are going off to the nation’s best colleges.

Students this year were accepted at Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Stanford, Columbia, Brown, University of Pennsylvania, Williams, Dartmouth, Wesleyan, Vassar, Amherst, Sarah Lawrence, UC Berkeley, UCLA, UC Santa Barbara, UC Davis, UC San Diego, Michigan, U Mass, Kenyon, Pitzer, Pomona, Macalester, Bard, Whitman, Earlham, Kenyon, Oberlin, Grinnell, Skidmore, Berklee College of Music, the University of Edinburgh, St. Andrews, Aberdeen, and Durham. Students were also accepted at the California State Universities.

Other Bay Area high schools that made Newsweek’s list include Skyline in Oakland, Albany High, Acalanes, and George Washington, Mission, Gateway and Balboa in San Francisco.

Tagged , , ,
?
  • John Chen

    I don’t see Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology of VA (TJHSST) in your high school 2010 list.

  • EBGuy

    Legacies? I’m assuming it’s a small percentage, but you never know…

  • http://francesdinkelspiel.com/ Frances Dinkelspiel

    EBGuy, legacy doesn’t go very far these days. Schools like Harvard, Stanford, etc admit 7% or so of the students who apply. To get in, a student needs the scores, grades and activities. Who your parents are doesn’t get you very far.

    It’s a testament to how hard working BHS students are that they were accepted at so many universities.

  • EBGuy

    Frances, I definitely hear ya, but at the same time, it has always struck me that Berkeley has some unique demographics. How many legacies go to high schools where over a quarter of the student body qualifies for subsidized lunches? Of course you’ve got to be ‘qualified’; I didn’t mean to imply that anyone was skating by…

  • Maude Court

    Wesleyan University in Middleton Connecticut, should also be included in the list of schools where BHS students will be attending.

  • http://francesdinkelspiel.com/ Frances Dinkelspiel

    Wesleyan is added.

  • Maureen Burke

    Also NYU, University of British Columbia, University of Oregon, Cal Poly SLO, Juilliard.

  • EBGuy

    EBGuy, legacy doesn’t go very far these days.
    The datasets are somewhat old (admissions practices are evolving), but here’s (PDF alert) a study that looks at various admissions biases ‘normalized’ to the old SAT scale of 1600 points total.
    Other things equal… the preference for legacy candidates is worth 160 points. For comparison: African-American applicants receive the
    equivalent of 230 extra SAT points (on a 1600-point scale), and being
    Hispanic is worth an additional 185 SAT points.

    And, FWIW, here’s something a bit more current regarding Harvard: The acceptance rate for legacies in the class of 2011 was about 34-35 percent, far higher than the 9 percent overall acceptance rate that year. Note that others have suggested that self-selection may contribute to part of this difference.

  • Roxanne

    “BHS was ranked 446 out of 1,600 schools in the 2010 report. In 2009, the high school was ranked 271, up from the 2008 ranking of 286.”

    ““It’s not based on a lessening of progress at Berkeley High, but an acceleration elsewhere,” said Coplan.”

    Hmmm…says who, Mark Coplan? Did you just make that up? Many parents can see that BHS has been slipping over the past few years and no one has bothered to look at why. Terrible teachers are allowed to stay forever, evaluations seldom get completed on time, classes are overcrowded, VPs seldom return phone calls and many leave problems unsolved for months; there isn’t even a suitable rate of STAR testing to qualify for an index, and the principal does nothing to encourage taking the STAR tests. Makes you wonder what they are trying to hide over there. Why doesn’t the School Board make someone look into this if the school won’t take a good hard look @ themselves? Of course there are some great teachers but a school that big has to look at trends. The trend is DOWN.

    Some kids know when they need help with school – they go get tutoring or ask their parents. But many kids who are really in trouble in school don’t ask for help – and those are the ones whose parents have to stick their noses in and see what’s what. Berkeley High is more like the second kind of kid right now. It’s time for Mom and Dad to stick their noses in.

  • laura menard

    Right on Roxanne, Coplan is someone I worked closely with on PTA council, we did some great literacy programs training elementary parents to work with their kids. I used to consider a friend, Mark is a MAJOR disappointment to many of us. But hey he got a public pension and can retire pretty young, so he did what most are doing, looking out for #1.

    Sure BHS gets students to top good colleges, that is not NEWS, but how many kids are making it through their first year and graduating. I have seen more kids far less prepared for college since the breakup into small schools programs. I have discussed this with several teachers/admin I trust and they echo the same concerns.

    Coplan, the board and certainly Slemp often make pronouncements but rarely does the finding have any supporting data, if the district wants to reform, maybe that is the first place to start, real information communicated to the public and used internally to administer programs. The new charter school is a great example, they voted for HOPE not a solid plan built on educational best practice or sustainable financing.

    On another tread Dierdre echoed the most common myth repeated by PIO Coplan and his bosses, that the stakeholders (parents) are the PROBLEM. Berkeley folks continue to allow this crap to go unchallenged, but hey as long as your own kid is doing well then what does it matter, go ahead and blame parents who have to go suffer that BEEHIVE to rescue their child’s education.

    Parents pay the bills and have as much at stake as teachers. I have watched this district DISRESPECT harming parents and for what purpose, so they can cover up errors and avoid accountability.

    During the BHS meeting with the Supt discussing the principal selection process I made a simple observation that the school does not need a “healer” rather they need a capable systems manager who operates with INTEGRITY. I was somewhat reassured when the Supt emphasized the systems manager as the critical component. Maybe then the culture of lies, myths and blaming the community can finally stop. When the school board stops this nonsense describing the position as requiring someone “who walks on water” maybe on day two of the job the new SAVIOR won’t drown. This is infantile talk, and is the most likely reason for candidates not showing up to interviews.

    My sis is a PIO and works for the federal government. When dealing with controversial issues she employs the media in educating the public with science and facts building support for progress on tough issues. The Voice’s Snapps repeating the BS Coplan and others use just shows how really unsophisticated Berkeley is.

    For the record, I speak from considerable experience, since I was the identified problem parent Michele Lawrence blamed for chasing Patti Crista away, leaving #2 Slemp to be hired. Crista and I had a good laugh via email and I know exactly why she and others do not take the job or stay very long. But those reasons are not very interesting to overly political Berkeleyans.

    But if you keep repeating the crap blaming parents then you gained street cred with the admin bullies, and that kind of power is popular in Berkeley.

  • Maureen Burke

    As has been noted elsewhere on Berkeleyside, proficiency scores at BHS have declined dramatically over the past 7 years. The greatest decline has occurred in the small schools, where students in the IMP math program have proficiency rates that are approaching zero.

  • deirdre

    “On another tread [sic] Dierdre [sic] echoed the most common myth repeated by PIO Coplan and his bosses, that the stakeholders (parents) are the PROBLEM. Berkeley folks continue to allow this crap to go unchallenged, but hey as long as your own kid is doing well then what does it matter, go ahead and blame parents who have to go suffer that BEEHIVE to rescue their child’s education.”

    Hm. I view the primary stakeholders as the kids. I am a parent who’s actively involved in Berkeley public schools, I participate in the PTA council, and I view myself as both part of the solution and part of the problem. We’re involved in a complex relationship here between kids, educators, parents, administrators, and the legislature. If the educators and administration spent half their time kowtowing to me and meeting my needs, would the schools suddenly be better? Personally, I don’t think so.

  • laura menard

    The primary triangle places the kids in the center and the parents, staff and community in equal positions supporting kids.

    I for one will never agree that I am part of the problem, I am a responsible parent, period, that is not complicated.

    Kowtowing, wow, one year as a parent advocate might shake you out of your illusions.

    What is “complicated” is getting the district to COMPLY with state law when a serious situation involving student safety has occurred. I just this morning received an update from a parent following court hearing and expulsion hearing, the district is failing in their duty AGAIN.

  • Alan Saldich

    I would like to contribute a strong positive plug for Berkeley High – our daughter is just finishing her first year in the IB program, and we were pretty impressed with all six of her teachers. They were young, enthusiastic about their subjects, and seemed to be on the ball. We had no administrative problems, and her evaluations and homework seemed to be evaluated quickly. Add to that a great experience in two sports, and I have to say we were pretty impressed. Obviously it’s not going to be the same for everyone, but we had a great first year.

    The other thing I’d add is that I attended some great schools in my life, and my own experience is that large or small, public or private, high school, college or grad school, there is always vociferous complaining about a variety of issues – some of it no doubt is justified, but some of it is, I think unrealistic.

    So – while we all want all our institutions to be better, and continuous improvement should always be on the agenda at all schools, companies and organizations, I didn’t personally experience any of the issues highlighted in this thread, so I thought I’d just highlight that.

  • deirdre

    Okay, then I stand corrected. It’s just the rest of us parents that might occasionally and unwittingly be part of the problem, not you. Please accept my apologies.

  • http://basiscraft.com Thomas Lord

    Deirdre,

    Can I ask your opinion about something? Let’s stipulate that there’s a parent problem – I’m not arguing one way or the other on that one here. Does it have any correlations with the division into small schools and AC? The reason I ask (my bias) is that I have this hypothesis (for lots of reasons) that the institutional division into small schools and AC is the main source of political gridlock and and significant contributor to budget problems.

  • deirdre

    Thomas: Thank you so much for asking. The question you pose is beyond my area of personal knowledge, so I don’t feel qualified to respond with any authority.

  • Maureen Burke

    The Newsweek metric is meaningless. Newsweek should have included the number of AP/IB tests taken in which students received a score of 3 or above. For example, Berkeley High has a number of AP courses that are a joke. AP History as taught by one notoriously bad teacher does not require any homework all year long, not even a single essay. The kids in that class are woefully unprepared for the AP test and very few score a 3 or above. So what if they took the test?