Police

Mountain lion tours Gourmet Ghetto

A mountain lion was reported wandering through North Berkeley’s Gourmet Ghetto last night, and after a pursuit by Berkeley police was shot at 3:26 a.m. on Walnut Street.

According to Sergeant Mary Kusmiss, the first reports of the mountain lion were received shortly after 2 a.m. A community member reported seeing the animal in the parking lot of the now empty Elephant Pharmacy. When police arrived to investigate, the mountain lion ran east up Cedar Street, jumped a fence into the playground of All Souls Episcopal Church on Spruce, and then entered a rear yard on Spruce. Police contacted the residents and advised them to “shelter in place”.

The animal was then spotted running onto Oxford Street, before moving to Walnut. When it went into the rear yard of 1634 Walnut, the residents offered their house and its rear porch to the police to locate the animal. Officers took two shots at the mountain lion with a patrol shotgun. The animal approached them and went into the driveway of the next door property at 1630 Walnut. An officer with a patrol rifle killed the animal there.

According to Fish and Game Warden Patrick Foley Foy, “It was a clear danger and the police took the necessary action.” According to Foley Foy, who serves in the Law Enforcement Division, it is “extremely rare” for a mountain lion to be found in an area as built up in the Bay Area. “I’ve never heard of a mountain lion in that kind of location,” he said.

The statement from BPD’s Kusmiss stated that, “Despite the sensitive nature of this event, we feel confident about the actions taken by the BPD Officers considering the totality of the events, when considering the densely populated area in which the animal was in, the homeless that sleep in the area, the overnight employees who clean businesses and the like, the adjacent schools and the northern Shattuck corridor. BPD believed that this Mountain Lion posed a significant public safety threat. BPD officers who have to dispatch animals find it challenging, but it is part of our duty to protect the community.”

A warden from Fish and Game who arrived after the animal was killed assessed the mountain lion as a 90- to 100-pound female. According to Foley Foy, that’s a full-sized animal for Northern California. In Canada, mountain lions are sometimes up to 200 pounds, he said.

Update To learn more about the what options the police had (or didn’t have), see our follow up story.

Photo by Tony Hisgett/Flickr

Tagged , ,
?
  • http://basiscraft.com Thomas Lord

    The California Department of Fish and Game explains when it is a mountain lion is deemed a public safety threat:

    Under the DFG’s Public Safety Wildlife Guidelines, an animal is deemed to be a public safety threat if there is “a likelihood of human injury based on the totality of the circumstances.” Factors that are considered include the lion’s behavior and its proximity to schools, playgrounds and other public gathering places. The determination of whether an animal is a public safety threat is made by the DFG or local law enforcement personnel on the scene.

    Regarding animals so deemed:

    The DFG or law enforcement personnel on scene will secure the area, then locate and kill the offending animal as soon as possible. The DFG does not relocate mountain lions that are a threat to public safety.

    http://www.dfg.ca.gov/news/issues/lion/lion_faq.html

  • http://basiscraft.com Thomas Lord

    Also: is it unusual to spot deer down at the Marina near Cesar Chavez park? I nearly walked smack into a young one. Startled us both. I didn’t hang around looking for mama deer.

    I’m wondering if the deer are being driven down in larger numbers, with at least this one cat in tow.

  • http://basiscraft.com Thomas Lord

    Ah, geeze, another thing to worry about:

    Seems to me like there’s an upswing in people keeping farm animals in Berkeley (chickens, ducks, goats, etc.). Lion buffet.

  • Big John

    It’s unlikely the animal was hunting for food. Plenty of it up in the hills. there’s even the Little Farm in Tilden and they don’t get any mountain lion attacks there.

  • Big John

    Thomas: Was this animal a threat? Seems to me it was wandering streets, not attacking anything or anyone. Just trying to find it’s way home until it started being chased by police. And what sort of training or expertise do ‘law enforcement’ officers have to determine whether or not an animal is a threat, especially when they have not witnessed any threatening behavior?

  • Jane Tierney

    There are documented accounts of excessive deer habituating in North Berkeley, even nesting and raising young in gardens and backyards of homes. DFG has advised repeatedly for neighbors to fence their fruit and vegetables and discourage deer from nesting in yards, in order to prevent interactions between deer and humans, and inevitably, to prevent the encroachment of lions in search of deer. Too many residents think “Bambi” is cute, and foster nesting. We are hurting these wild animals by providing refuge. They should stay wild in Tilden and other reserves. This is the result.

  • Andrew

    I was just at the San Diego zoo and saw a wild cat (I don’t recall the name of it), and I stood there for several moments and watched it pace around. It was a beautiful creature, but it absolutely had an aura of predator around it. There was an ethereal animalistic quality to it and all I could think is that I hope I never run into one in the wild. Even if it is in Berkeley. These animals will do whatever it takes to survive and they are extremely cunning and powerful. We might respect them, but they don’t see us in the same way.

    Too bad it could not be tranquilized or caught, but let’s be honest that the Berkeley police departments responsibility is public safety, and a 100 lb. mountain lion roaming the middle of Berkeley is a serious threat.

  • Pingback: Why the Berkeley mountain lion was not tranquillized | Berkeleyside

  • http://basiscraft.com Thomas Lord

    Big John, you asked me:

    Was this animal a threat? Seems to me it was wandering streets, not attacking anything or anyone. Just trying to find it’s way home until it started being chased by police.

    Well, it’s about 2:30 or 3 in the morning and it’s meandering about an area – including yards – where there are domesticated outdoor cats, where pet dogs can be let out in the middle of the night to take care of some business, where people’s brothers-in-law might be visiting from Germany, having a quiet smoke in the garden, where there are probably homeless people about, where there is no clear, quick shot for it to get back into the wild, where – should the cat successfully go hide somewhere – the morning will bring young children nearby, etc.

    You say “Just trying to find it’s way home until it started being chased by police.” I don’t think you can attribute such a motive to the beast. My understanding is that lions roam large territories. So far as we know, it was “home” as far as it was concerned.

    And what sort of training or expertise do ‘law enforcement’ officers have to determine whether or not an animal is a threat, especially when they have not witnessed any threatening behavior?

    I’ve no idea about the training per se, but here are the guidelines that explain how the Department of Fish and Game treats the matter:

    http://www.dfg.ca.gov/news/issues/publicsafety.html

    The language is deliberately vague. If the officers perceive the lion to be an imminent threat, they may (and should) isolate and kill the animal on their own authority.

    In this case, the lion was allegedly wandering in areas that would give it ample opportunity to hide and emerge just a few hours later when, for example, young children were at or on the way to school. Meanwhile, it had plenty of opportunity to evade officers and take pets or people that night. By every standard, that comprises an imminent threat.

    Let’s consider the other course of action that was open to the officers:

    They could have decided that the cat was not an imminent threat and therefore contacted (in the middle of the night) the Department of Fish and Game to come attempt to capture the animal. How do you suppose DFG would have responded? My guess is that they would ask about the circumstances and then ask “Why the hell haven’t you killed it? Don’t you know that you’re authorized to do so when there’s an imminent threat? There is no way we’re going on a lion-trapping expedition in the middle of a damn city.”

    As for this particular cat, I think the police’s judgment is vindicated (though their marksmanship called into question :-) if the account is indeed true that after they failed to bring it down with two shot-gun blasts, the beast decided to get closer and investigate those strange, loud, monkey-like creatures.

    (I also wonder if they just clean missed with the shotgun or if the pellets weren’t enough at whatever range that was to do more than annoy it.)

  • http://basiscraft.com Thomas Lord

    Big John,

    You also offered this gem:

    If it’s Ok to kill a mountain lion in town, I suppose then it’s alright for mountain lions to eat a hiker or 2 in Tilden.

    Don’t know what it means for it to be “OK” to kill a lion or a hiker but here’s the thing:

    Suppose a hiker startles a lion in the middle of the night while wandering around where the lion thinks its cubs are hanging out. I don’t think we be saying “Oh, goody: somebody got killed!” but on the other hand we wouldn’t think of the lion as doing much other than what it had to do under the circumstances. And there would be dark humor to go with it, too. For the hiker, a Darwin Award. For the lion in question, his dream of starting off as plungeur and working his way up to sous chef at Chez Pannisse cut short by the unchallenged “species profiling” of our trigger happy (but bad shots) police force.

  • Big John

    Did this cat attack anyone or anything? I don’t think has been any report of such. After traveling through Berkeley hills all the way down to where it was killed, not one reported instance of an attack on a dog/cat/student/chicken/visiting German brother-in-law??? Surely this cat had ample opportunity to do demonstrate it’s blood lust, or was it simply trying to find its way back to the woods?

    There is more potential of another human attacking your laundry list of possible victims, than there is of a mountain lion.

    As for the safety of kids going to school in the morning… better keep them FAR away from our streets, since there are more life threatening situations from speeding drivers in Berkeley than there are from wild animal attacks in the entire country, if not the world!

  • http://twitter.com/Weezus Rachel A.

    It doesn’t work having wild predatory animals wandering among an urban population. Regardless of how anyone feels about mountain lions or any other wild animal. It’s death is unfortunate, it is a real loss. And the BPD did what was required to keep the public they serve safe.

    Mountain lions aren’t like bears, who can be scared off (unless they’re undernourished like the one in Yellowstone recently) with loud noises. It’s a wild cat who will stalk its prey. I find the anthropomorphizing about it a little naive.

  • http://trampleasure.net/lee Lee Trampleasure

    The number of replies to this post is proof of why news media loves animal stories :-)

  • http://www.davosnewbies.com Lance Knobel

    Lee, we’re wondering if there’s a way to transform Berkeleyside into an all-animals, all-the-time site. We’d clearly quadruple traffic over night.

  • http://twitter.com/Weezus Rachel A.

    You might start with a couple of pictures of a cute cat trio (“The Whiskers”?) playing at the Cheeseboard at lunchtime. Pizza + Locovores + Cats = Winner!

  • http://Berkeleyhomes.com/blog Ira Serkes

    Los Gatos by the bay?

  • Jenny Wenk

    The World Wildlife Fund, the U. S. Dept. of Fish and Wildlife, and several other sites agree. The California Mountain Lion (or cougar) is neither threatened nor endangered. It’s cousin in Florida is. But due to the Initiative passed by the voters of California several years ago to prevent any hunting of our mountain lions they are flourishing. As the one exploring a toddler park at All Souls Church so beautifully demonstrated. Since they are the top of the food chain they have no natural enemies. All of this explains the increasing frequency of human and lion contact in both parks and rural areas. And why Fish and Game told the Berkeley Police Department to kill this animal. Since I heard the shots, and know what the ambient light was at that time, I congratulate our BPD officers for stopping it with only four shots from their rifles. This was not an easy situation since obviously they did not want a rifle bullet to penetrate a house and hurt a sleeping human.

  • jj

    WTF c’mon people! If the mountain lion became agitated by being shot with a tranquilizer, and mauled a human, you’d be just as up in arms. Tranqs don;’t work instantly! I am not a huge fan of police, but in this instance I think they did their job. It’s terrible and sad but at least no human beings got injured. That would have been just as much of a tragedy.

  • Pingback: Mountain lion calls swamp police, including 911 calls | Berkeleyside

  • nrs5000

    As a resident of the GG, I will note that there are an unusually large number os signs up in the neighborhood about missing pets. Perhaps there is a connection here.

  • ulogoni

    Rachel A. said: “Mountain lions aren’t like bears, who can be scared off (unless they’re undernourished like the one in Yellowstone recently) with loud noises. It’s a wild cat who will stalk its prey. I find the anthropomorphizing about it a little naive.”

    This comment is naive. Puma can be scared off just as easily as any other non-habituated wild animal. This cat was in the act of fleeing (i.e. being scared off) when the police arrived. Puma are ambush predators as you mentioned. They will not and cannot continue to stalk prey when their cover has been revealed. To pursue wild, healthy prey out in the open would be a waste of energy for this type of hunter. Being ambush predators they are much more sensitive to being seen than bears.

  • ulogoni

    Puma use corridors through cities more often than is realized. Even busy downtown cities. But judging by the reactions reminiscent of screeching, hysterical primates (with guns), I won’t point out where exactly this occurs.

    Not long ago the Oakland police gunned down an immature deer that was chased into a backyard. Fangs, hooves, it doesn’t seem to matter for some. Too many folks these days can’t seem to interpret basic, natural behavior or to properly assess a threat. More and more are becoming distanced from the natural world.

    A pursued cougar will not be hunting for food. If there was any possibility for aggression in this scenario it would have been because she was being threatened with escape routes cut off. Defensive, not offensive. In all likely hood she would have found her way back to the hills, or if she was too bewildered, found a tree to wait out her pursuers. At which point a tranq gun could have been easily employed had officers immediately contacted Fish & Game. And, of course, if Fish & Game agents had compassion for individuals instead of simply playing numbers games. Last I checked, humans are not threatened or endangered either. In an ethical society this should not be the point.

  • http://basiscraft.com Thomas Lord

    ulogoni:

    You should read the account reported in the Berkeley Daily Planet:

    http://berkeleydailyplanet.com/issue/2010-08-24/article/36171?headline=Highly-Urbane-Mountain-Lion-Shot-Dead-in-North-Berkeley

    As it so happens, the police allegedly tried to give it egress back up the hill and to encourage the predator to make haste back to more comfortable surroundings. The animal chose, instead, to begin to try to evade the officers while remaining downtown, scurrying through yards and over fences.

    If the account is at all accurate, it suggests the need for a snap judgment: kill it promptly or presume that it will not make its way back to the wild and will hide in the neighborhood as dawn approaches.

    How would you suggest that BPD safely and sanely handle the public safety emergency of “Gee, the work day is starting. And somewhere around here is an agitated mountain lion, hiding.”?

    I really don’t understand this widespread sentiment that the police did something wrong. To me, that judgment borders on obscene. I’m startled that people are so naive about animals.

  • Big John

    Right on ulugoni!

    “In all likely hood she would have found her way back to the hills…”

    Which I’m sure has happened MANY times before with critters who lose their way out of their natural habitat.

    I still have heard no reports of any people or animals killed or maimed along this ‘bloodthirsty killers’ path form Tilden to the GG. which is not exactly a hop skip and a jump. There had to have been some kittys, or incontinent dogs, insomniacs, or even chickens, geese, rabbits, rats, … something along the way that this ‘menace’ would have torn to shreds during it’s urban exploits.

    Or could it be that ‘Puma’ was simply lost and wanted nothing more than to get to the sanity and security of the forest?

    As for the BPD encouraging the big cat to get back to her turf… how exactly did they do that? And how exactly was she supposed to know that’s what they were trying to do. “Go up to Rose to Spruce and make a left, then a right on Marin???” Now let’s talk about naivety.

  • grad student

    Look, the questions shouldn’t be whether it was right to kill the lion or not but why the police officers didn’t have any kind of guidelines? We cannot blame the police officers, they did what they had to do, but it shouldn’t be the job of a police officer to decide the fate of an animal that is wondering through the streets of Berkeley. The discussion should really be what the police should do next time around. I am shocked that they didn’t have a standard procedure, which was approved by the people, to follow in such situations given the fact that there are deers all over Berkeley. Perhaps the standard procedure should be to tranquilize the lion and let the experts decide whether it can be sent back to the wild or not.

    Given the absence of such a standard procedure, I think police did their job. But it is shocking that there is no such procedure.

    Also, most people don’t have any understanding how wild animals think, if they think at all. The fact that police tried to force the lion to go back doesn’t mean anything unless one can prove that the lion really understood these intentions. For all we know, it could have been that the lion thought “oh my god, all these crazy people are running after me while I just want to pee, maybe I can pee behind that tree over there next to that house and then deal with them”, bang.

  • Pingback: In memorium: Berkeley’s mountain lion | Berkeleyside

  • Houston, TX

    Does anyone working at DFG or law enforcement understand ecology? Cops today are the most trigger happy individuals on the planet, they must of been ecstatic when given the opportunity to have a late-night urban hunting party. They probably went to the Jack in the box drive-thru after wards. I vote for giving mountain lions handguns to even the playing field. Maybe they deem us a threat to public safety.

  • http://www.felidaefund.org Ally – Felidae Conservation Fund

    We, at Felidae, are saddened by this tragic incident. Felidae is a local Bay-Area organization dedicated to advancing the conservation of the world’ wild cat species and their habitats through a combination of pioneering research, compelling education and state-of-the-art technology.

    Our local project is the Bay Area Puma Project — BAPP — It is the first major study of pumas in the San Francisco Bay Area. The goal of this 10-year research and conservation program is to increase our understanding of local puma populations and their interactions with humans, in order to facilitate a healthier co-existence between people and the natural world. BAPP’s initial research study is currently underway in the Santa Cruz Mountains, where 10 pumas are being monitored using cutting-edge GPS/accelerometer collars.

    Our Executive Director has written a statement that is posted on our website at http://www.felidaefund.org regarding this incident

    To read her statement, go to this link — http://www.felidaefund.org/mountain_lion_berkeley.html

  • http://www.davosnewbies.com Lance Knobel

    We pointed to the Felidae open letter in our latest post: http://www.berkeleyside.com/2010/09/03/in-memorium-the-mountain-lion

  • Paula Friedman

    I’m surprised by the comment by DFG’s Patrick Foy that he’s “never heard of” a mountain lion in an area “as built up as the East Bay,” since residents know very well, and have for years, that these animals live in the hills and may come down sometimes into town. I recall photographing, 10 years ago, a sign next to Lawrence Hall of Science in the Berkeley Hills warning of a cougar sighted there–and being startled, as I did so, by a deer. Of course cougars are beautiful kitties, but with a creek about 1/2 block away from my present (non-East-Bay) home being mountain lion turf, I’ve realized we, and our children, are too close to deer size to be simply sentimental about these cats.

  • http://www.davosnewbies.com Lance Knobel

    Paula: if you read the quote from Patrick Foy, he said he’d never heard of a mountain lion in an area as built up in the East Bay, not as the East Bay. He’s encountered many in the East Bay, clearly. What was so remarkable about Tuesday’s incident is that the mountain lion had strayed to virtually Berkeley’s downtown area. That was what was so rare.

    It wouldn’t be so remarkable to find a mountain lion near the Lawrence Hall of Science.

  • Pingback: Cougar News » Blog Archive » A tribute to a dead cougar in Berkeley and two others killed recently in the Midwest

  • Dennis Jones

    RIP mountain lion.

    You must have had a hard life, trying to scrape a living on the edge of human civilization. I can only imagine how scared your last minutes of life were.

  • Seth

    Big John,

    Your apparent ability to read the minds of wild animals is pretty impressive. Do you really think you can say, with 100% certainty, that this lion would not have attacked a person or a child? How low would the odds of an attack be for you to be comfortable with just letting the cat go? 10%? 5%? 1? The truth is, given the information–a wild animal that appeared stuck in a highly unusual and heavily populated area–the probability of an attack was higher than any answer you would give.

    The police chased the cat for over an hour, trying to chase it back up into the hills. That, to me, sounds like about the best they could do. The department of Fish and Game, which monitors these things, says it was handled right. The Felidae Fund, an organization that specifically works on conservation of wild cats in California, said this (in a statement linked to by others above): “The police on the scene Tuesday morning responded as well as one could expect. This is such an abnormal event, that any response must be to ensure the safety of the community.”

    If you’re so certain the police and the experts are wrong, maybe you should go up to Tilden and walk around alone at night. By your logic, there’s no chance you’ll get attacked, so it must be a fine thing to do. Maybe bring your children. Tell me how that goes

  • Big John

    Seth:

    It is important to keep in mind that lion attacks are still extremely rare in California and nationally. For some reason, humans worry much more about rare dangers than about common dangers. Two examples:

    In California, from 1986 through 1998, exactly two people died from mountain lion attacks, whereas in one year alone, over 4,000 people died in traffic accidents, including 800 pedestrians. This means that your car or someone else’s car is ~2,000 times more likely to kill you than is a mountain lion. (A Detailed Calculation gives the ratio as between 1,150 and 4,300.)

    Over 300 people have been killed by domestic dogs in the U.S. between 1979 and the late 1990s. This means that your family dog or your neighbor’s dog is ten times more likely to kill you than is a mountain lion and hundreds of time more likely than is a coyote.

    So we should be much more worried about meeting a car or the dogs we see every day rather than a mountain lion. Unfortunately, we aren’t, because we are much more familiar with being in a car or being around a domestic dog than we are with being around an uncaged mountain lion. Rationally, if one avoids hiking because of fear of mountain lions, one should also avoid driving in a car, crossing a street as a pedestrian, or getting close to our own or anyone else’s dog.

  • Big John

    23 people in North America were killed by cougars between 1890 and 2010, including six in California. That’s 120 years. 6 deaths in California, where, according to Fish and Game, there is currently a “healthy” population.

    See here for Lion Mountain attack history since 1890:

    http://tchester.org/sgm/lists/lion_attacks_ca.html

    Yes, mountain lions are dangerous animals. But they also avoid interactions with humans as best they can, which is generally very good. Just try to go into the woods, day or night, and find yourself a mountain lion.

    Given the chance, or if no one had noticed this cat ‘prowling’ the streets, and you can be sure that this is not the first cat that came down the hill to see what all the noise and strange smells are, she would have found her way back to her own territory. If she were hunting, we would have seen some evidence of that by now.
    And we haven’t.

    No, I am not stupid enough to walk around Tilden at night, but if I did, and people do, there is a VERY slim chance of getting attacked by a mountain lion. Greater chance of falling and cracking my skull open, or being shot by a someone thinking I was a dangerous predator.

  • Diane

    Cars have nothing to do with this event. I could talk about the odds of getting a disease, odds of dying in an avalanche, odds of tripping on the curb and killing myself, odds of choking on a chicken bone, etc. And none of that has anything to do with a mountain lion wandering an urban area.

    Now as a matter of public policy if we want to say it’s fine to let mountain lions wander in the city, then we can do that. That’s a matter for discussion I suppose. But it still doesn’t have anything to do with completely unrelated risks. Apples and oranges.

  • Mike Farrell

    Well “Big” John, there is certainly plenty of opinion put forward as fact on this thread, and you aren’t shy about joining in.

    Mountain lions have avoided interaction with humans: a behavior we should encourage.
    Trying to “find” a lion and failing doesn’t mean they haven’t found you. And thought whatever top predators think. Mostly I’d guess “too big.”

    I am sure this is not the first time a big cat has come down from the hills – it wouldn’t surprise me if this mountain lion had made repeated trips downtown. They are ambush predators and good at concealment.

    No evidence of predation? They are known to prey on pets, and this neighborhood is constantly posted with “Missing Cat” signs.
    How do you measure the worth of on life over another?
    Is the lion’s life worth more than a few domestic cats? To whom?
    To the elderly shut in whose constant companion and friend is her cat?

    Why are people so fascinated with one species and not another? This fixation with a big bad predator seems remarkably similar to an 8 year old boy’s fascination with fast cars and fighter jets. (Admittedly, each more deadly.)
    Is it because they are big? Are you worth more because you are “Big”?

    Am I personally worried?
    No.
    Do I have concerns when my neighbor’s 2 year old goes into their garden at dusk, in search of strawberries?

  • Seth

    John, I don’t think anyone’s disagreeing with you that the likelihood of an attack was fairly low. I’m certainly not. But there’s a big difference between believing that and wanting to put it to the test.

    I also don’t think anyone disputes that there have probably been other mountain lions in the area before. But that doesn’t change the information the police officers had at the time.

    The officers involved tried to chase the animal back into the hills for an hour. The animal was in an area with a lot of families, pets, and homeless people, at least some of whom are, to be blunt, not our most mentally stable citizens. At what point does the risk of an attack outweigh conservation?

    Lastly, I’ll point to your own words: “Yes, mountain lions are dangerous animals. But they also avoid interactions with humans as best they can, which is generally very good.”

    I absolutely agree. So doesn’t the fact that this particular cougar found its way into a very densely populated area suggest that it is decidedly unlike its brethren? If it came down into a part of town that is not easily confused with mountainous parkland, doesn’t that suggest that it was hungry, or sick, or at the very least, an atypical and thus less predictable animal?

    There were a lot of difficult judgments for the responding officers to make that night. It’s unfortunate that it ended this way, but it was obviously the right call.

  • Big John

    Seth: Look, it seems we agree to some extent. One other probable reason for the lion’s presence in the ‘hood’ is that she lost her way. This is a problem for many wild creatures; birds lose their way migrating because the familiar habitat that they know and depend on has changed. Development (some call it “progress”) has destroyed much of the natural habitat that wildlife depends on. That leads us to this point in time, where wildlife interacts more and more with “civilization” (I use quotes because in my mind, the killing that goes on… of animals or of other people…. in this world makes me question if we have gotten to the point where we can call rightly ourselves “civilized” yet). How do we react? Do we kill everything we don’t understand? We’ve done so in the past, but that doesn’t mean we need to continue doing it that way. We can be better than that. We need to be. We need to respect and revere nature (you know, ‘the Earth does not belong to us, we belong to the earth’), and not look as it something to kill off so that we’re safe and comfortable. My point about cars and dogs is they too have the potential to kill, as do the police, as do we all. Do we pre-emptively shoot all of those threats? The police in this case judged an animal as a killer with no evidence that it had such intentions. “We” are innocent until proven guilty. “Others” are not so fortunate.

  • Big John

    Mike: It was a small bullet that killed the cougar.
    The only thing “Big” has to do with this is the “Big” fear that people live by.

    “There are very few monsters who warrant the fear we have of them.” ~Andre Gide

  • Pingback: Mountain Lion Killed at Gourmet Ghetto « Robert Lindsay

  • http://www.felidaefund.org Ally – Felidae Conservation Fund

    Announcement of East Bay Mountain Lion Community Meetings:

    Wednesday, September 15, 7:30pm at Live Oak Park in North Berkeley — Recreation Center, Live Oak Park, 1301 Shattuck Ave, Berkeley

    Wednesday, October 6, 7:00pm at the Oakland Zoo — Marian Zimmer Auditorium, Oakland Zoo, 9777 Golf Links Road, Oakland

    Felidae Conservation Fund will be holding two public community meetings to discuss the Mountain Lion Incident on August 31 in North Berkeley.

    Zara McDonald, Executive Director of Felidae, will talk about mountain lions in the Bay Area and provide perspective on the growing concerns about public safety. She will also discuss the research and educational work currently underway in the Bay Area Puma Project, the first major study of pumas in the Bay Area.

    Additional participating organizations for the North Berkeley event include LOCCNA, Oakland Zoo, ‘Close to Home’ Lecture Series, and other supporting organizations.

    These meetings will also offer the opportunity for community members to share thoughts and concerns regarding mountain lions and this incident.

    If you have questions, please email info@felidaefund.org.

  • http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande Mike Vandeman

    One wonders whether humans are really as smart as they claim. Obviously, killing the animal wasn’t their only option. They should have captured it (tranquilizing it if necessary) and transported it to better habitat. Why wasn’t animal control called in?

  • Pingback: The Gourmet Ghetto mountain lion: final word | Berkeleyside

  • Pingback: Mountain lion and two cubs spotted in Berkeley hills | Berkeleyside

  • Pingback: Berkeleyside’s most popular stories of 2010: The lion roars | Berkeleyside