News

South Berkeley community gathers in wake of murder

From left to right: Ed Alvarez and Lee Roddrick from BART, Phil Kamlarz, Max Anderson, Tom Bates, Michael Caplan, Erik Upson, Michael Meehan, Andrew Klough and Sue Ferrara.

Berkeley city leaders were out in force Wednesday evening to meet with a community still reeling from the seemingly random, senseless murder of 35-year-old Adolfo Ignacio Celedón in their neighborhood earlier this month.

Mayor Tom Bates, as well as Police Chief Michael Meehan, representatives from BART and several senior city officials were on stage at the Black Repertory Group Theater on Adeline in a gathering hosted by Councilman Max Anderson, who oversees the Adeline corridor. On the agenda: public safety in the area, as well as other ways the neighborhood could be improved.

About 100 people, including neighbors, community leaders, friends of Celedón and his fiancee, Amber Nelson, as well as residents of nearby north Oakland were in attendance. The meeting began with a moment’s silence for Berkeley’s four homicide victims so far this year.

Speaking about the Celedón murder, Chief Meehan said he was hopeful the case could be solved. He reported on the overhaul of the police department that he has instigated since arriving in Berkeley nine months ago. He also stressed the importance of community vigilance and pro-active behavior in relation to crime. “There are 129 Neighborhood Watch groups in Berkeley and they are very effective,” he said.

Capt. Erik Upson from the Berkeley Police Department conceded that the neighborhood in question was targeted because it is on the border of two cities. “Criminals are aware of the weakness a border creates and they use it to their advantage,” he said. Both police officers spoke of the work that is being done to improve collaboration between the Berkeley and Oakland police forces — including making their radio communication more compatible.

Several community leaders in the audience spoke of their concerns and actions they were taking to improve safety. They included representatives from the East Lorin Neighborhood Association, the Halcyon Neighborhood Association and Sam Dyke from the local Merchants’ Association. Councilman Kriss Worthington also spoke later in the evening.

Each of the panelists gave a short presentation. Mayor Bates spoke of how anxious he is to do something about Adeline Street. “It’s so forbidding and difficult to cross,” he said. City Manager Phil Kamlarz said investing in the area was by definition limited given the tough economic situation. However he was hopeful that developments such as the new Ed Roberts Campus, which is due to open in January 2011, would help boost the district.

The city’s economic development manager, Michael Caplan, who has lived in the area for 22 years, said he was encouraged by the recent influx of new businesses, such as Flacos and The Other Change of Hobbit bookstore. He spoke of the Community Walk-Through which drew around 40 people on Aug. 18, and which resulted in a long list of concerns — from broken water covers to illegal dumping — that are now being addressed.

Andrew Klough from the Public Works department and Sue Ferrara from the parks department reported on ways their teams are working in the community.

Other concerns raised by participants included the prevalence of liquor stores and pigeons, the lack of a blight ordinance in Berkeley for single family dwellings, recent parking meter modifications which are seen by many business owners to be detrimental, and the increased fear among young people in particular to be out in the area on foot or on bikes.

Charlene Washington from councilmember Max Anderson’s office says a follow-up community meeting is planned in three to six months.

Print Friendly
Tagged , , , , , ,
  • T Francis

    I have met our new Police Chief and view that he will be working hard on behalf of the City. Some of what the City proposes may actually make things better in the neighborhood (they are in a much better position than I am to comment on that).

    I tend to repeat “10 points” when a violent act (such a murder / shooting similar to this incident) takes place. The 10th one differs a bit every time, but the first 9 stay about the same:

    1) Some parts of the City suffer more than others from violence.
    2) We boarder an area of Oakland with known gang (and/or criminal) activity, adding to the complexity of policing Berkeley.
    3) Some times of day are safer than others to be out and about.
    4) Guns are too prevelant in our society / too easy to obtain.
    5) More often than not, a young person committed the crime (I don’t believe they realize the “process” of moving from 20 to 40 to 60 to 80 years old – what years in prison will feel like)
    6) The area where the crime occurred may “get safer”, but it will take money for that to occur.
    7) In Berkeley, change just does not seem to occur very fast (as compared to other Cities I’ve lived in).
    8) Change can displace current residents, many of whom have limited options – it presents a real quandary for all of us, not the least our electeds
    9) After this story fades, another similar one will replace it.

    And finally the 10th point, which is a bit different every time (i.e., only the names and the particular circumstance changes) =
    10) The (—death–) of (—Mr. Celedon—) was tragic. Something should be done.

    Regardless of who prevails in coming elections, I believe that public safety and policing needs, particularly during what appears to be an extended era of economic strife and higher unemployment, will be a topic that comes up frequently. Heres hoping it is a priority for those running for Council office, as I think our neighborhoods will be asking them to make it so.

  • Buttery Beeping

    How was this meeting publicized? I am an eyes-open South Berkeley resident, and I had no idea that this gathering was taking place. I would really have liked to participate.

  • http://www.tktaylor.com Tracey Taylor

    Buttery Beeping: The question of how the meeting was publicized was raised on Wednesday night.

    At least one community organizer said she had leafleted her neighborhood. But councilmember Max Anderson admitted that outreach was “a weakness in our armor” and that his office had been too reliant on email blasts in the past. He spoke of wanting to communicate more directly with residents in his district.

  • Buttery Beeping

    I would have been happy to receive an email. We are in Darryl Moore’s district, and I received nothing. Of course, I have never seen any kind of effort from Darryl Moore’s office to gather email addresses from the community, so I’m not sure that email would be the most effective outreach method.

    There were definitely no leaflets or flyers in our neighborhood.

    Since moving to South Berkeley two years ago, I have heard nothing from my council rep’s office. I live five blocks from San Pablo Park and walk there with my daughter nearly every day…I had no idea about the park’s 103rd anniversary and attendant celebration.

    Is my ear insufficiently to the ground? Maybe, but I’m the kind of person who stops and reads the flyers on telephone poles, and I devour local news voraciously. How much work should a resident be expected to do in order to get the word about a community meeting? Who do you have to know?

    Our city council representatives should be reaching out to us for anything that calls for public participation, and if anything, we should be be hearing *too* often from them. Instead, we hear nothing and read about it in the news the next day.

    I disagree with Laurie Capitelli about most city issues, but I’ll say this for him: I don’t even live in his district, but I know what is going on there! In my own neighborhood, I’m in the dark.

  • Mike Farrell

    Obviously anyone posting here could have been notified by email, but check out Anderson and Moore’s web pages on the City’s website (http://www.cityofberkeley.info/home.aspx)

    Clueless: Max Anderson’s 804kb photo of himself, and useless; everything about Darryl Moore’s page, would be a kind description.

    Don’t expect much outreach there.

  • laura menard

    As the former chair of the largest, diverse and active neighborhood association in district 3 I can say without pause Max Anderson and his staff receive a grade of F for outreach, communication and support of community efforts particularly public safety. The manage the community outrage strategy represented at the Wed meeting was put into action following the Derby ST murders in 2008, in which a list of basic city maintenance services is detailed in response to serious violent crime. I will admit it is step up from the usual hostile lecturing by Anderson starting with “you people”.

    As the chair of ROC I organized flyer distribution for monthly meetings for years. Despite this labor intensive volunteer effort to make sure the entire beat was noticed Max would still insult us with his dismissive statements telling those in the room that they do represent the real community living in south Berkeley. Of course he used the same tactics Wed despite the fact that his cronies and the city staff outnumbered the rest of us. This is Max at the top of his game, same skill set utilized in 1985 when mayor Hancock deployed him in her failed effort to force redevelopment zoning on south Berkeley.

    Max Anderson, Maio, Worthington and Bates continue to undermine community mobilization in south Berkeley by substituting grassroots community efforts with the public health dept subsidized CAT team. Did you know that a handful of Max supporters are paid to attend community meetings?

    BART has scheduled the installation of surveillance cameras as part of the renovation of the downtown station, Ashby BART is scheduled for phrase 5 or renovation plan. The reporting here failed to address this issue.

    Does anyone know who was filming the meeting and for what purpose?