Police

Notorious Berkeley drug house sold

1610 Oregon Street

For more than 20 years, the house at 1610 Oregon Street was an epicenter of Berkeley’s drug wars, a place where dealers dealt crack openly, people were shot, and crowds and cars congregated.

Now the shingled house, once owned by Lenora Moore, is shuttered behind a chain link fence. The glass in the front windows is broken and two “No Trespassing” signs and a red “Keep Out” sign are nailed by the front door.

For decades, Lenora Moore and her extended clan of Perrys and Robinsons lived in the modest, two-bedroom home near California Street. But they left in early 2010 after four court battles, a grand jury investigation, and finally, an injunction won by the city of Berkeley declaring the house a public nuisance.

Now the house has been sold to a new, unidentified buyer.  A offer was accepted on the property Oct 29, just 10 days after the house went on the market for the low price of  $199,000, according to a spokesman for Security Pacific realtors, which listed the property. The house had been in foreclosure.

For next-door neighbor Paul Rauber, who was the lead plaintiff in a 2005 suit brought by 14 neighbors against Lenora Moore, the exodus of the family has meant an end to gun battles, late-night partying, the discovery of used hypodermic needles and condoms on the street, and a fear of going outside.

“It’s been delightful,” said Rauber. “It’s been like a normal neighborhood. People aren’t afraid anymore to walk past our house in the evening with their kids. It is like night and day.”

Paul Rauber and his daughter. Rauber moved next door to 1610 Oregon Street in 1996

The battle to force Lenora Moore and her extended clan to stop the blatant drug dealing went on for two decades, and exposed the political alliances and racial politics of Berkeley in a not always flattering light.

Lenora Moore, now 80, was a member of Berkeley’s African-American society, a woman who worked for Catholic Charities for years, was friendly with eight-term City Councilwoman Maudelle Shirek, and someone whom many respected.  When she claimed that she was unaware that some of her children, grandchildren and their friends were selling drugs 24/7 out of her home, many of her supporters believed her. She was never charged with involvement in drug dealing. Her supporters were outraged that a group of mostly white neighbors were trying to evict her from the house she had owned for decades and said racism and gentrification — not an attempt to close a drug house — was the motivation behind the various neighborhood lawsuits.

But a review of police and court records shows that 1610 Oregon Street was a place where, for decades, almost anyone could buy pot, heroin, or crack cocaine. A 1994 Berkeley Police Department log shows officers made hundreds of visits to the house in just that year. Lenora Moore’s grandson Mark A. Perry was killed nearby in April 1992 in a drug-related shooting. One of Moore’s sons, Frank Moore Jr., and a grandson, Ralph Perry Jr., were shot by rival drug dealers in October 1999 in the 1500 block of Oregon. Other members of her family, including her son Steve Moore, Jr., were arrested and convicted of drug-related offenses.

Yet for decades attempts to stop the rampant drug dealing failed. A group of 30 neighbors sued Moore in 1992 in small claims court and were awarded $155,000 for the pain and suffering brought on by the activity in the house. The decision was upheld on appeal, but Moore never paid the fine. Instead, she filed for bankruptcy and transferred title of the house to a son and daughter-in-law.

The drug activity at 1610 Oregon continued, although neighbors worked closely with police to tally and report any suspicious activity. In 2000, the city of Berkeley cited Moore for 22 code violations, forcing her to move out temporarily while repairs were made. But the city, despite support from then-Mayor Shirley Dean and other city council members, was not able to force Moore to stop the dealing on her property or leave her home.

Front door of 1610 Oregon Street

In 2005, another group of neighbors sued Moore in small claims court and won a $70,000 judgment that was held up on appeal. That group of neighbors only filed suit when their pleas to Moore to move didn’t work.

The two court judgments did little to stop the drug dealing at the house. In 2008, the Alameda County Grand Jury investigated Berkeley’s relative inaction in the case and criticized the city for not being more proactive in closing blighted residential properties.

In April 2009, Berkeley won a permanent injunction to abate the Moore house, which was declared “a public nuisance”. After police used a search warrant to find drugs in the house in October 2009, the city won a court order to board up the house for a year. Berkeley sent in a crew to clean out the place, and the workers had to wear hazardous material suits to protect themselves.

The Moores finally moved out. GMAC Mortgage foreclosed on the house and it was put up for sale in October. There was an open house in mid-October, and prospective buyers had to use flashlights to walk around inside since there was no working electricity, according to one neighbor. They also told visitors to proceed at their own risk, since the house was in such disrepair.

The $199,000 price tag was considerably lower than similar houses nearby. A two-bedroom house at 1519 Oregon Street is estimated to be worth $449,000 and a similar house at 1637 Oregon is estimated at $480,500, according to Zillow, a real estate website.

While Oregon Street is noticeably better now that the Moores have left, there are still pockets in south Berkeley where the drug dealing goes on blatantly, said Rauber.

“California Street is still a mess,” he said. “There is drug dealing right down on the corner of California and Oregon.”

Print Friendly
Tagged , , , , , ,
  • djt

    I doubt this is the only house and situation like this. There was one in my neighborhood that was closed down, purchased, fixed up, and now a law abiding citizen is raising their family there and the neighborhood is much more peaceful.

    Without living near one of these, you can’t appreciate how wide a circle of destruction it causes. We know how these places work; how the owners avoid responsibility; and so on; there is no reason it should take more than a few months to close down places like this and force a sale.

  • laura menard

    Nice little Berkeley tale, what isn’t being explained in this intro piece is the background story, a sordid tale of just how perverse and dysfunctional a place Berkeley can be.

    1610 Oregon represents a huge citizen effort confronting the complacency and dysfunction in city operations and the de facto zoning practices resulting in a disparity of public safety and health outcomes between Berkeley neighborhoods .

    For instance, the fact that it was top city officials who invited us to a 2004 city hall meeting suggesting we organize another small claims court but this time the city was prepared for a “parallel” process of code enforcement actions. The city reneged of course, which is why in 2008 I filed a complaint with the grand jury, whose report recommended the city improve its abatement operations. So far there is no indication of such improvements, I understand there is another drug house slanted for abatement, depending on the process the city uses and the outcome I will judge whether on not they have learned from this expensive lesson. Which is another story altogether.

    The so-called supporters of Moore were a small, vocal and uninformed group lead by Osha Newman, CopWatch’s Prichett and Leo Stegman. The Daily Planet reporting was a bad joke, more than one person working there at the time told me Osha basically dictated to the reporter covering the trial. The Planet coverage failed to share juicy details from the court proceedings, including the amazing moment when a seasoned Drug Task Force Lt testified about whether or not Lenora was knowledgeable about the criminal activity of her kids, grandchildren and great grandchildren. In response to Judge’s questions the Lt turned to Lenora personally reminding her about how long they had known one another, and about how many services the city had offered and that they would always come down and warn her prior to a police raid. The Lt explained that he and a top city staff member would visit Lenora telling her the situation was getting out of hand and if she failed to take action the police would be forced to raid the house. This went on for years, warnings and raids.

    I remember watching the BDP reporter’s expression during the Lieutenant’s testimony, I knew full well this amazing moment and numerous other facts would never make it into the story. Facts like how much money Lenora has netted in serial refinance schemes, in 2009 bank documents the total at that time was $800,000. That there was never any threat of her or her family becoming homeless. She now lives in east Oakland and OPD raided the place due to complaints already. She had more disposable income that any of plaintiffs, hard working taxpayers who were slandered with labels such as racists and gentry. HA!

    Here in Berkeley there was more drama than common sense, Paul did a fantastic job responding in Planet commentaries including the one linked which includes this explanation of how cities use standard procedures to abate drug houses without abusing good citizens:

    http://www.berkeleydailyplanet.com/issue/2005-11-18/article/22803?headline=Commentary-An-Open-Letter-to-My-Friends-in-Berkeley-Citizens-Action-By-PAUL-RAUBER
    It doesn’t have to be this way, you know. On Oct. 24, Oakland announced the conclusion to a very similar situation:

    “Oakland City Attorney John Russo and City Council President Igancio De La Fuente said today that a family of drug dealers has agreed to sell a house that they say has terrorized a Fruitvale District neighborhood for 20 years. . . .Russo and De La Fuente said Ruby Harris, whom they described as the matriarch of a drug-dealing family, agreed in a settlement filed in Alameda County Superior Court today to sell her home in the 3000 block of School Street and move out by Dec. 20.

    “In its lawsuit, the city attorney’s office alleged that Harris ‘allowed her home to be a drug nuisance, permitting the unlawful use, sale, storage and manufacturing of controlled substances since at least 1987.’

    “Russo and De La Fuente said the city has tried for years to get Harris to control the behavior of her children and grandchildren through signed settlements, but Harris’ family members have violated the agreements. . .[N]ow the Harris Family, in order to stave off hundreds of thousands of dollars in public nuisance fines from the city, will have to move out and the residents will be able to take back control of their street.”

    Why can’t we do that? Berkeley citizens might well ask. And for a good start, my many friends in Berkeley Citizens Action might well ask their leadership why it is participating in smearing good people who are only trying to rid their neighborhood of a notorious source of drugs and violence.

  • Lauren

    Ah Berkeley Bureaucracy at it’s finest… What a joke our city politics
    have become that coupled with the highest property tax rate in the state, our schools are a mess and our infrastructure is falling apart WE NEED TO GET BACK TO BASICS stop trying to fix the rest of the world’s problems and focus on ours
    RIGHT HERE RIGHT NOW!

  • Tim C.

    there’s a nuisance property up in the Berkeley hills, not drug related as far as I know, but abandoned and dangerous. I’m fairly sure the house for sale next door isn’t selling due to the nuisance. Why doesn’t the City have an effective abatement program?

  • laura menard

    Tim C,

    sounds like you are describing a blight problem, the Berkeley blight ordinance is considered by many concerned neighborhood leaders to be rather weak.

    http://wefightblight.blogspot.com/

    you can check out this blog for background and issues

    Enforcing the BMC and state laws in a systematic and equitable manner is definitely NOT one of the city strong points.

  • savingracesarah

    Sounds like a great movie. I’d watch it.

  • fuzzymerkowitz

    I have lived next door to a crack house for 13 years. This guy isn’t your typical crack dealer. He’s a two strike felon. He is very careful and discreet. He takes no responsibility for the actions of his clients and he doesn’t use himself. This is a business. The abandoned cars in his driveway are used as a late night place to turn tricks, used comdoms, hypodermic needles, threats on my family, and we have been robbed of anything of value in our yard. Plus we have had a break in where thousands of dollars worth of computers and valubles were stolen. The crack head prostitute who did this admitted it to me 4 years after the fact. Guess what: BERKELEY P.D. DOES NOT CARE ON ANY LEVEL! If I complain they will send a car by to observe for 15 minutes 3 weeks later. If they don’t see major action they are gone. One time he had a woman locked into his house who was screaming through the security fence (pad locked) for the police. We called them and they spoke only to the crack dealer, then left. This is like the time the police delivered an escaped victim back to Dahmer’s apartment. Never saw her again. Maybe she never came back, but we didn’t see her leave. We have had a near fight to the death struggle over a gun in our front yard. I have raised two girls next door to this man. If there was a similar problem in the “right” neighborhood it would be handled 13 years ago because the police think anyone who lives in this neighborhood is trash. They only deal with problem people and they all live in San Leandro. We’re on our own out here. Some of our neighbors don’t even know it’s a crack house! They assume that the crimes that happen in our neighborhood are just crimes. These crimes are absolutely perpetrated by his customers. The neighborhood recently “gentrified” and these new people have their head buried in the sand. I guess it will take 13 more years before they will help in any way. The house is at 1247 Burnett street.

  • Pingback: Chief Meehan: “You can never sit back and relax” | Berkeleyside

  • http://www.davosnewbies.com Lance Knobel

    Fuzzymerkowitz: if you want to get in touch with us through tips@berkeleyside.com, I have a police officer who is eager to get more information from you.

  • Voxhumana

    It is sad and shocking that the police were impotent to deal with these and several other situations now and in the past in Berkeley, where neighbors were/are held hostage to City of Berkeley administrators’ political correctness, self-protection and agrandizement. Who is in charge? Not the mayor (except for development), not the City Attorney, (at least no efforts put forth there, unless FORCED by a demonstration or threat of lawsuit against the city), not the Code Enforcement Officer (a joke of dismissiveness and defensiveness, if you’ve ever had the “pleasure” of meeting him,) not the City Council (only concerned with getting re-elected and not taking any deliberate stance on anything.) Even if you sue in court, there is no progress on either collecting an award if successful, or seeing an end to the disgraceful activities, because the police will not enforce any of the municipal code violations. Ever. Even with a court order. Why? Either they’re too busy, or they’ve been told not to by someone in charge. You pick. The code enforcement officer for the city (recently quoted on Berkeleyside) once told a group of neighborhood representatives that: “you should be grateful your situation isn’t worse, at least there’s no gunfire.” Nice attitude.

  • Tim C.

    wow..story from the Burnett neighbor is astounding..a simple stake out should be enough to nail all perpetrators…or do we have a situation where corruption is involved?

  • Pingback: Best of Berkeleyside: This week’s most popular posts | Berkeleyside