Berkeleyside

10 Berkeley resolutions for 2011

Given the relatively humdrum results of our 2010 resolutions, Berkeleyside could take the easy way out and repeat the same list. Take it as read that the 10 points we singled out a year ago are still largely unfinished business. But let’s look ahead to further issues for this year:

  1. Berkeley schools weather budget cuts with educational experiences largely unimpaired. There’s more pain coming for California’s schools in the coming year, as a new governor wrestles with the chronic state budget crisis. Berkeley schools are insulated to some extent by local voters’ consistent support — the parcel tax proposed by Measure H passed with 80% support and the bonds authorized in Measure I passed with 77% support in November. Cuts, however, are cuts and Berkeley will surely face some painful decisions. We’d like to have a New Year’s resolution for increased funding for schools, but we’d like a pony, too.
  2. Berkeley sees a substantial drop in violent crime. Last year was marred by six murders in Berkeley, the same number as in 2009. There was also a spate of armed robberies. Let’s hope the new policies under Chief Michael Meehan show significant results in 2011.
  3. Our city will continue to punch far above its weight in the arts. For a city of 100,000, the Berkeley arts scene is extraordinary — Berkeley Rep, Cal Performances, BAM, and on and on.
  4. West Berkeley will emerge as a center for entrepreneurship and technology. We know we had a similar resolution last year, but all that underused property in West Berkeley is just crying out for something.
  5. Business in Berkeley will find grounds for more optimism than the last few, dismal years. That means fewer empty storefronts, and also resurgent business for existing retailers.
  6. The university will add to its roster of Nobel prize winners. Okay, Oliver Williamson was awarded the economics prize in 2009. But we were blanked in 2010. Time to get back on track.
  7. Berkeley’s politicians will concentrate their energies on the things that matter for citizens locally. That means empty storefronts, potholed streets, safety, long-term city finances.
  8. Berkeley will do more to live up to its goals of being a bike-friendly city. When we wrote about Berkeley’s disastrous ranking as a danger spot for cyclists and pedestrians, our commenters had plenty of suggestions for improvement. Let’s see a few implemented.
  9. Some more late night eating and drinking spots will open. There’s little to complain about in terms of food in Berkeley — we have, after all, one restaurant for every 300 residents. But there are still too few choices if you want a bite when you come out of the theater or a movie.
  10. Berkeleyans will learn to stop worrying and love its new recycling carts.
Print Friendly
Tagged , , ,
  • http://jdtangney.com John Tangney

    #4! Yes, please, #4! We need more tech in Berkeley.
    –johnt

  • Francesca Verdier

    How about better street lighting? Berkeley has worse street lighting than any other city I’ve lived in (Baltimore, New Haven, Montreal, Ithaca, Corvalis).

  • http://berk94708.blogspot.com John Parman

    I like your 2011 resolutions. I still find the new recycling carts inferior to what they replaced.

    They exclude waste that is clearly recyclable.

    They exclude and, worse, criminalize the people who derive part of their income from recycling – a pittance, but clearly significant enough for them to risk fines. They could be robbing our cars and houses, but they’re not – they’re doing a job that the city has declared its monopoly, to the point of claiming that whatever we put in the cart and put on the curb is theirs. The marginal are also part of our community. Waste is ultimately part of the commons, and they have a role in it, too. When they have no role, when the city makes them outlaws, we will find that it’s worse for us, not better. Meanwhile, the city will enjoy its monopoly.

  • http://www.davosnewbies.com Lance Knobel

    Francesca, you’re so right about the street lighting. I wonder whether it’s on purpose — an asset for local astronomers — or just terrible specification for the street lights.

  • tom

    Streetlights are light pollution .. I LOVE my dark neighborhood. Please, no more streetlights, too-bright megawatt halogen porch lights, or motion-sensor lights that flick on for every passing pedestrian or car on the public right-of-way. I prefer to see the stars at night.

  • not gruntled

    Agree with John – let the “informal” recyclers do the work. Berkeley would save lots of money and we wouldn’t have these huge diesel trucks running around the City. Also, the informal folks only take the items that it makes sense to recycle. Recycling plastic, for example, is a net negative environmentally.

  • Ephemerol*29

    My prior understanding of any new street lighting here in N. Berkeley arrives from trying to have one installed on my street corner that was missing and was never ever installed. When I spoke with the person in charge of all of this years ago when I moved in I was told that there was a ‘freeze’ on installing any “new” street lights in Berkeley despite the reality and fact of ours being missing. What is wild is that if I walk to the new TJ’s stores here after sundown, which is pretty early as per the light, there is one block here that is fully blacked out and has zero street lights on it and it’s just “perfect” for predatory street thugs, intoxicated teen trash and car thieves to do their work and….they do…time and again. I switch over to the other side of the street when walking that stretch as it’s just too dangerous. Even then it’s dim and nearly dark. When you add the non-stop recycling can poachers, armed criminal street thugs and assorted mentally disturbed people walking these streets you do so at your “own” personal risk and peril. I am also aware that many people here desire to keep it this way, so I am going to leave it to others to clean up their neighborhoods. Just look for the burglar bars on just some of the widows in even the best of neighborhoods and it’s a reality check on what has come before you arrived and what will arrive when you least expect it. Street lights are part of a more comprehensive program to keep our streets safe for everyone and not just the criminal element which has full access, invitation and apparent entitlement to them here.

    Lance Knobel says:
    January 1, 2011 at 8:01 pm
    Francesca, you’re so right about the street lighting. I wonder whether it’s on purpose — an asset for local astronomers — or just terrible specification for the street lights.

  • Berkeley Mom

    About lighting-I live in N. Berkeley. My street has plenty of lights, but they are antiques, or at least antique-looking, and are essentially useless at the task of lighting the street. Almost all of their light is directed upward or outward, perfect for shining into homes, preventing bats, owls, insects, etc from being able to operate as normal, and drowning out the stars. I’m quite sure that even if the city had the money to replace or retrofit them, people decrying the demise of their historic appearance would prevent it.

    I’ll add my wish for grafitti abatement to #7.

  • Ephemerol*29

    @Berkeley Mom says:
    January 3, 2011 at 10:40 am
    About lighting-I live in N. Berkeley. My street has plenty of lights, but they are antiques, or at least antique-looking, and are essentially useless at the task of lighting the street. Almost all of their light is directed upward or outward, perfect for shining into homes, preventing bats, owls, insects, etc from being able to operate as normal, and drowning out the stars. I’m quite sure that even if the city had the money to replace or retrofit them, people decrying the demise of their historic appearance would prevent it.
    I’ll add my wish for graffiti abatement to #7

    Your ancient street lights: In N. Berkeley I find this very odd to envisage or comprehend. Back in New England where I grew up, we used to have incandescent bulbs mounted under green stamped corrugated metal hats for street lights back then. I doubt that they are ‘that’ ancient. Most of them here are high pressure sodium that give off that warm amber gold glow that is not to toxic. If they are of this variety you can request that they be fitted with a special circular shroud that will direct the light away from bedroom windows and buildings in general and these are ‘street lights’ and not house lights. Call public works and ask to speak with the street lights division and see what is what with this issue or modification: Btw. Here is the latest as per the City web site on any new lights or full replacements. It does not mention modifications however: http://www.ci.berkeley.ca.us/ContentDisplay.aspx?id=8116

    As per graffiti abatement, this is an ongoing curse and scourge in Berkeley 24/7. We just had one kid walk up our entire block and he pounded all of the new recycling cans with his fist and then marked them with large broad gang graffiti script. They even trashed the fire hydrant which I just had painted white with another color. The better news is that I can scrape this new marking off with the rough side of a foam dishwashing pad as it does not bond to these newer cans so well ( good! ) and I am out now to do just that as it’s just inviting more mayhem as it blurts out the message that “Anything goes in this neighborhood and you can do what ever you desire – including armed robbery, car theft, burglary and tire slashings”

    Here is the City link for the graffiti issue and remedy: It’s endless here where I live. http://www.ci.berkeley.ca.us/ContentDisplay.aspx?id=9794

  • Berkeley Mom

    Ephemerol*29, thanks for those links. Our street lights are sort of like giant matches – a tall pole, with a bright yellowish (sodium?) lightbulb inside a frosted glass dome. No cover or anything to direct the light downward. The design aesthetic is 19th century-ish, although they are certainly not that old!

    I am very excited about the possibility of a retrofit…although I’ve never seen such a thing on any of the many streetlights of this type.

  • Ephemerol*29

    Graffiti removal: Free samples and an affordable neighborhood resources for instant removal. Forget about waiting for the City to remove this stuff. I just went out and scrubbed this off the new recycling cans here and it’s not that easy. This new more thought-out and tested “Safe-wipe” packet may very well be what individual people living here need to stop this DOA in it’s tracks the same day with instant results and it’s affordable for a box of 20 I believe. I will be testing it out for the Berkeleyside and just ordered a sample to do just that. One wants to put out the message that this is “our neighborhood” and not yours to trash and that there are very rapid consequences if you do. See the video below. All it takes is just two people on your block ( even one ) and it’s over with! No waiting for any City removal that may or may not arrive and always miss the smaller things like the cans anyhow. Take back our communities and neighborhoods! The City should just “send” us these to take care of our own neighborhoods. It would save them millions in labor costs. Next up, Potholes and how to get them fixed.

    http://www.graffitiremovalinc.com/our-products/graffiti-safewipes

  • Ephemerol*29

    The potholes: This may *not* be easy as your dealing with a City corporation and internal politics and departmental agendas, however here is the web link for pothole repair for Berkeley. Let us all know here how you fare with either potholes or what are called ‘sidewalk buckles’. If there are problems or foot dragging let us know that also as there are ways to escalate the process within and outside of the City in other public media. However some streets are so broken, pitted, cracked and shattered that they have to be entirely repaved and are treacherous. However, that is another separate discussion and conversation.

    http://www.ci.berkeley.ca.us/CrmRequestIntake.aspx?requestTypeHandle_IN=REQUEST-TYPE-POTHOLE

  • Mike Farrell

    Regarding potholes, we have a few on my block that recur, unavoidably as the street was last paved in 1962. When one starts to grow I call the good people at public works, and the pothole is filled within 24 hours, occasionally 48.
    I actually like the distressed nature of the street since the city currently prohibits “vertical deflection devices” for reducing speeding.

  • http://stefanco.com Stefan Lasiewski

    Regarding streetlights, check out the new white-LED streetlights on San Pablo in Albany. They are pretty nice and seem to provide some wide-spectrum lighting, and from what I notice they direct most light downwards. They might be an improvement in terms of light pollution.

    Oh, how I wish to see more then 20 stars in the sky from my backyard.

  • Ephemerol*29

    @ Stefan Lasiewski
    Comments:
    Regarding streetlights, check out the new white-LED streetlights on San Pablo in Albany. They are pretty nice and seem to provide some wide-spectrum lighting, and from what I notice they direct most light downwards. They might be an improvement in terms of light pollution.

    Oh, how I wish to see more then 20 stars in the sky from my backyard.

    Stephan and all others: I have seen these lights and others in the wine country in one small City where they were being tested. There truly has to be more than just one word in the English language for the term ‘horrid’ so I will leave that to others to ponder and evaluate. Albany at night as well as it’s side streets looks, feels, and appears as a frozen gulag in Siberia with those LED panels. Their color temperature is so cold, limited, dead and lifeless I can only hope and pray that other cities demand something better as well as more advanced vs. the cheap and dirty version as these are. While it’s a good idea in just one dimension ( cost possibly ) the light that they put out is emotionally sterile and vacuous as well as very limited in it’s ability to actually do anything practical. LED technology is still evolving as I type and one of the most difficult problems that they have had is that the light spectrum that they are trying to coax into being more like an incandescent bulb is very very difficult to achieve at this time as it’s so squirrely when one is up in the nanometer part of the spectrum. Maybe there will be a break-through with new materials at some point however that tipping point is not now and the current product is flat out ugly and worse. What is occurring in Europe as per banning the incandescent bulbs for commercial sale, is that the major light companies are back at work in the research lab reinventing the light bulb that had not changed in generations. People have been demanding them as the replacements are too cold and ultimately way too toxic. The last article I read indicated that the new ones will be based on an internal ‘capsule design’ that will make the standard incandescent bulb superior in it’s energy efficiency, which it has never *ever* been. All of these old bulbs loose about 90% of their energy on heat vs. any light and all of these large corporations were just fat and lazy with the issue until now. LEDs have their place, however there place is not every place, especially in sensitive lighting situations.

    As far as seeing the stars here in the City, I am sorry to say that that will never ever happen again due to the reality and fact of there being too many millions of people all crowded together here in the bay area. Even if Berkeley were to turn off all of it’s lights and electricity, you or anyone else would not be able to see the stars as you would in say the deep country, LEDs or not. You really have to drive a distance away from the city ( any city now ) to see the milky way and if you cross over just one hill say towards Santa Rosa, it’s gone. So if you want wilderness and a true connection to the universe as I do, one has to travel and live in another location away from the millions of people that are all congregated here and it’s not easy.

    Here is the data and testing numbers on the LED street lights and other technologies: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/03/100308132136.htm

  • Mike Farrell

    Missing from the “streetlight” discussion is the fact that Street lights are meant to illuminate the street, and often do so without providing adequate pedestrian lighting. This is very much the case on residential blocks with large street trees.
    Pruning can sometimes mitigate the shading from trees, but is generally unsatisfactory.
    If Berkeley is serious about being walkable and mass transit friendly, pedestrian lighting in residential neighborhoods is a must.
    Pedestrian lights are lower, underneath any tree canopy, more frequent and cast their light down on the sidewalk.

  • CJ Higley

    I agree completely with Mike about pedestrian lighting being crucial to a walkable city. The recent spate of armed thuggery in North Berkeley, together with the already high baseline level of deranged folks wandering around at any given time makes it very unappealing to walk at night, especially alone. This makes even walking home from transit stops after work during the winter months scary for a lot of people. I see this as a key livability issue for Berkeley.

  • Ephemerol*29

    @CJ Higley
    I agree completely with Mike about pedestrian lighting being crucial to a walkable city. The recent spate of armed thuggery in North Berkeley, together with the already high baseline level of deranged folks wandering around at any given time makes it very unappealing to walk at night, especially alone. This makes even walking home from transit stops after work during the winter months scary for a lot of people. I see this as a key livability issue for Berkeley.

    Yes, yes and yes. I also wish that it could all be that easy. What I mean to caution about is the reality that many armed street robberies and now done in broad daylight and so are burglaries ( after people have gone to work in the morning ). In the meantime, what I have found to be “very” effective in walking later at night or off of BART in North Berkeley is to carry an aluminum 3 D cell or 3 C cell MagLite with one when doing this. The criminal element and assorted street loonies and teen thugs will give you a very wide berth and you an easily spot and thus avoid the notorious Berkeley sidewalk buckles that are equally as dangerous. I truthfully cannot see Berkeley or any other City installing any new additional lighting at this time, so the motion sensor lights in various homes are a good temporary answer to this issue of darken sidewalks at night. I have had car thieves break into a full run when they saw me walking up my street at night this way. Have a whistle on your key chain at all time also. You can break off any charges or bites from unattended dogs this way also. It’s 25x more dangerous walking in Berkeley on a good day than driving I am sorry to report. I refuse to walk up Cedar to Shattuck Ave. day or night now. All of my neighbors have been attacked and robbed doing this and so will you given enough time. Forget the police. They are just here to fill out the forms, look terse, strike poses and look try to appear important and pissed off and then tell you to “be careful”.

  • TN

    I thought about street lighting last night as I was walking in my neighborhood.

    The street lights do not illuminate sidewalks very well. In flatlands areas, houses are mostly fairly close to the street. And their porch lights noticeably supplement the lighting on the sidewalk. On my block, roughly half of the homes had their porch lights lit. In other areas, the proportion is significantly lower.

    If more porch lights were lit at night, pedestrians I think would feel and be a lot safer even if only from the reduced chances of tripping.

    With more energy efficient light sources, the costs of keeping the porch light on is very small. I recall that at one of our neighborhood watch meetings a couple of years ago, the Berkeley Police Department was giving away CFL light bulbs. This is something we can do as individuals without pushing for a large commitment to completely redesign Berkeley’s street lighting system.

  • Ephemerol*29

    My first pro-active pre-robbery ‘simulated gun’ threat police call this evening near Ohlone Park: I have made a new years decision to call in all intimidating simulated gun threats by anyone especially black juveniles while walking to and from Ohlone park to the new Trader Joe’s store, day or night now. Enough is more than enough with any street trash here and *if* you are going to behave like a criminal and street thug, then no problem as my speed dialer is set to 510.981.5911 which goes directly to the Berkeley Emergency Center’s 911 system actually a little faster at times than 911 does from your home phone, as it’s a direct call. I want to suggest that all of my neighbors who have this occur to them i.e. are run off the sidewalk by some street thug with a hand stuck deep into their jacket or pants simulating a deadly threat, just quietly step aside and let them win and then watch their path of flight i.e. North side of Hearst, South bound from California etc. as well as a full description. You will be asked for your name and this will then legally allow the local PD to then “search” this individual. I believe it prudent as well as wise to discuss acting on these street threats with simulated guns as in all honesty, you do *not* know if they have a weapon or not. Lets clean up our neighborhoods and take them back from the criminals and street thugs who now rule them with an odd legal impunity and who pillage our homes and person as if they are entitled to do so by default, because they ran out of drugs and want to have your cell phone, wallet / purse and or credit / debit cards etc. Please post your experiences and thoughts as you desire.
    _________________________________
    “Goodness” is threatening to those on the
    …opposite end of the moral spectrum.
    — Charles Spence

  • The Sharkey

    An interesting idea, but I live near part of Ohlone Park and have to say I honestly don’t encounter this kind of person all that much.

    What time are you running into these people, and in what part of the park are you having problems?