Is Berkeley High safe? Parents debate the question

Community theater at Berkeley High School. Note the cameras on the roof to film activity. Photos: Frances Dinkelspiel

In the middle of a meeting called to discuss guns and safety at Berkeley High School, the deputy district attorney in charge of Alameda County’s juvenile division stood up and announced that the community is not being realistic about how dangerous a place it is.

“I have seen the police report of every single person arrested at Berkeley High School this year,” Matthew Golde, the senior deputy district attorney for Alameda County’s juvenile justice center told a crowd of about 400 people at the Berkeley High School Community Theater. “Let me tell you the reality of the danger.”

Golde went on to say that in addition to the four gun-related arrests made last week, armed robbery is rampant at the school.  Students routinely bring weapons and use them to strong-arm people on campus, at the park across the street, and on Shattuck Avenue. And groups of BHS kids regularly burglarize houses.

“There are a lot of dangerous people here,” said Golde. “These guns are not being used just for protection. They are being used to commit crimes.”

Most damningly, Golde said there have been cover-ups of offenses. In one instance, there was a student who had a bench warrant out for his arrest for beating and robbing someone. Despite that, he attended classes at Berkeley High – and even beat up someone at the school. When police arrested him, “there were certain people in the school who tried to convince witnesses not to cooperate” said Golde.

The same thing happened with a football player who was arrested, said Golde. School officials, according to Golde, tried to encourage his friends from cooperating with the police so he could continue to play on the team.

Golde’s remarks were among the many shocking comments made at the meeting, which was billed as a chance for Berkeley Unified School District officials to hear the community’s reaction to a recent increase in guns on campus. In addition to four school board members, the school superintendent, the high school principal and the head of student services, two city councilmembers — Max Anderson and Laurie Capitelli — and a captain from the Berkeley police department attended the meeting.

While gun-related incidents at Berkeley High are not new, the sheer number this school year has prompted widespread concern. There were four gun-related arrests at or near Berkeley High last week on top of two earlier episodes in the school year. In addition, a student from B-Tech, the alternative high school, brought a gun on campus in early March. In October, a 17-year old Berkeley High student shot and killed 14-year old freshman Malik Grayson off campus. The 17-year old was expelled from school – as are all students caught with guns – but no charges have been filed against him, although police are still investigating the incident.

The marked increase in the number of guns on campus has prompted school officials to take steps to examine school policies and come up with a plan to improve school safety. In addition to hiring two additional safety officers, the school district is considering a number of ideas, including installing metal detectors, randomly searching lockers, and asking students to wear identification badges. Surveillance cameras are already ubiquitous on the campus.

The school board will hear a report on the issue Wednesday night and accelerate a plan to address the problem, Superintendent Bill Huyett told the crowd Monday night.

The discussion at the forum veered back and forth between parents who called for tighter safety measures and those who worried they would create an atmosphere of fear and could impinge on people’s civil liberties. A number of parents said the district needs to examine the pressures put on students that lead them to bring weapons to school.

One speaker, who identified herself as a senior at Berkeley High, said the school’s unlocked gates make it too easy for non-BHS kids to come onto campus and intimidate other kids. She recalled one time when there were two non-BHS kids sitting in one of her classes and, since the teacher that day was a substitute, it wasn’t noticed.

“A lot of students bring weapons on campus because they are fearful,” said the senior. “They are gang-related. They don’t feel safe on this campus because it’s too easy for people to come on this campus. Students don’t feel safe. If safety officers and teachers can’t protect them, then they are going to find a way to stay safe.”

Around 400 people attended the forum on weapons Monday night at Berkeley High

As the evening went on and more and more parents expressed their fears, some stepped up to say it was important to balance things. Most of the 3,300 students at Berkeley High obey the law.

“I don’t want to be overly-fear based, with our reactions,” said one parent. “I cringe when I hear metal detectors and keeping gates locked except during first period and lunch.”

“Those are guns in the hands of our children,” said another parent. “It’s not all about social issues. This is a school. That calls for metal detectors at every entrance and a closed campus.”

Throughout the night Pasquale Scuderi, the school principal, walked up and down the aisles of the Berkeley Community Theater to hand a microphone to parents so they could make remarks. In between questions, he took time to address some of the concerns that had been raised.

Scuderi took issue with Golde’s comments that BHS staff tried to steer students from testifying against students charged with a crime. That is not school policy and must have been a rogue staff member, he said.

BHS Principal Pasquale Scuderi

Scuderi also said that the school has worked with the police department to develop a plan in case someone starts shooting on the campus. In fact, the district and police department are working more closely than ever to address issues of safety on campus, he said.

The district is also reaching out to the community, since it is well documented that incidents of violence go down at schools that work closely with residents, said Huyett.

In fact, a number of people in the audience volunteered to spend time on campus to help keep an eye on things.

One speaker, who said he was a former Berkeley High student who had been arrested numerous times and had done a stint in prison, said he would like to talk to students about how he went wrong, and how he is now finding a way to live an upstanding life.

To get another perspective on the meeting, look at Berkeleyside’s real-time tweets on the forum.

Update, 9:45 p.m.: BUSD has made available video footage of the parent forum on weapons. The video coverage is in four parts and can be viewed here, here, here, and here

Related:
BHS Principal takes action in wake of gun activity [03.28.11]
Berkeley High students weigh in on gun issues at their school [03.24.11]
Update: Today’s two gun related Berkeley High School incidents [03.22.11]

Print Friendly
Tagged , , ,
  • Anonymous

    I believe Culper was referring to the Assistant District Attorney, not the Americans with Disabilities Act.

  • Laurammenard

    WL

    it is common knowledge that Crime view community is not updated regularly by any means. The daily bulletin has disappeared as well. BPD is very understaffed, and they have been replacing their records system with a new CAD/RMS system over the last couple of years.

    Chief Meehan has stated publicly numerous times that the dept is woefully behind and he does not get crime stats timely sometimes 6 weeks dated.

  • Patricia

    I can’t get thru by clicking on this link. Perhaps something is wrong?

  • Sharkey

    For the sake of full disclosure I need to mention that I went to a charter high school.

    It was located in a separate building on the campus of another high school. We used many of the same facilities as the rest of the students, but had a schedule that was slightly different so that we only mingled with the other students during the lunch period.

    It was safer than the high school I would have gone to otherwise (in a different part of town), offered more rigorous curriculum, gave students the opportunity to do internships with local businesses as part of their high school education (actually this was REQUIRED), and every single member of my graduating class went on to graduate from a four-year college or university.

    Perhaps the school I went to simply benefited from being able to pick and choose the students they admitted, but I can say with certainty that it improved *MY* educational outcome simply by putting me together with other students who were serious about education and separating us from the ass-clowns who were at school to cause trouble.

  • Berkeley Dissident

    I grew up in Berkeley. The public schools in Berkeley have abandoned us.

    They BUSD has refused to listen to the community’s concerns about safety for decades.

    They need to be held accountable. They’re spending our tax dollars, and they’re educating our children.

  • Berkeley Dissident

    So what? They’re safer. Moreover, they’re a stick that can be used to hold the mainline schools accountable. It’s been decades and Berkeley residents have had the same complaints. Complaints that have been responded to with liberal brow-beating, guilt-tripping, empty promises, and evasions. Enough is enough.

  • Berkeley Dissident

    Only in Berkeley would drug dealers and other assorted thugs exploiting high school students spark a debate about civil liberties, of all things. Idiocy. I’ve been in Berkeley for decades and it’s the same damned hot-air every time. I’m sick of it.

  • Berkopinionator

    @WL, are you really suggesting that the DA is lying because the City of Berkeley’s ill maintained community crimeview map doesn’t have dots on BHS? I trust the DA is telling the truth when he says that he has reviewed every single police report coming out of BHS. His position gives him total access to the facts. Juvenile crime is historically under-reported by school administrators that are afraid that the truth will make them look bad if the facts are known. California’s Mandatory Child Abuse Reporting Statute requires that mandated reporters including, teachers, immediately report suspected crimes against children to the police, is routinely ignored by school employees who think they know better, and that calling the police won’t help. It is a crime for a Mandated Reporter, including a teacher or school administrator, to fail to immediately report a crime against a child to the police. http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=pen&group=11001-12000&file=11164-11174.3 The reports are that BHS didn’t want witnesses to speak the truth about a football player. Any BUSD staff member that fails to report crimes against children to the police is a criminal under California law, and should be fired.

  • Berkeley Dissident

    Cover up, deny, dissemble. That’s been the BUSD’s modus operandi for decades.

    So bravo for the assistant DA.

    It shows a profound RESPECT for the people of Berkeley that he chose to share the relevant facts with us.

    Why shouldn’t a public official disclose information that should be public at a public meeting?

    Now it’s time to act on the information, like adults, and do the responsible thing: close the campus.

    It’s a best practice at high schools around the country. Berkeley High School should be no different.

  • Berkeley Dissident

    Actually, no, private schools are accountable, they’re accountable to parents.

    That’s a lot more than we can say about Berkeley High school on the safety issue.

    I was born in this town. This has been an issue for decades, not just for parents, but for people who live and work in the area around Berkeley High School.

    It’s time to grow up and take the simple, responsible step of closing the campus, asking everyone who enters campus to prove they belong at the school — as so many other schools do — and police the area around the school to insure that the muggings and drug dealing that have been going on for decades in that area comes to a stop.

  • Berkeley Dissident

    I fail to see the relevance of your remark.

  • Berkopinionator

    Bless the DA for speaking up and telling everyone the truth, even though they don’t want to hear it. We have a very dangerous small group of hardcore criminals who have already been convicted of felonies and are still carrying guns to school. Those bad boys need to be permanently removed from BHS. They do not have a legal right to pick the schools they attend. This urgent security problem is not about pot. It is about a small group of dangerous juvenile criminals carrying guns to school and terrorizing the community. Demand the school board revise their written policies and procedure to permanently (not one year) remove of all violent convicted felons from BHS. Those juveniles criminals do NOT have a legal right to attend BHS! They need to be in their own special program where they can receive the supervision they need and deserve. The 99% of good kids at Berkeley High that aren’t carrying guns, committing armed robberies and burglaries deserve safety at school. Take the thugs away!

  • foolroller

    You’ve discredited yourself with your fixation on developing your fatuous pot=violence equivalence. Come up with another pseudonym and start again. Sorry.

  • Bruce Love

    Ok, Berkeley Dissident. Are we allowed to fact check him? Let’s please see a list of his specific claims, since comments on Berkeleyside seem to indicate no to people heard quite the same thing.

  • foolroller

    “Only in Berkeley would drug dealers and other assorted thugs exploiting high school students spark a debate about civil liberties, of all things”

    This is a demonstrably false statement. If you think only people in Berkeley question the drug war and hysterical calls for intensification of government surveillance and restrictions on freedom, you’re completely wrong.

  • chris

    seconded; crime view data is incomplete.

  • Doc

    Unfortunately, anyone who mentions that school violence and the achievement gap are artifacts of the purposefully invalid registration system is attacked for not being true to Berkeley leftism.

  • Former Parent

    Berkeley High School should be a closed campus simply for student’s safety. It was before the 1989 earthquake, but was opened because of food service issues after the cafeteria collapsed. I believe this defect has been long remedied but in spite of the school safety committees ongoing recommendations over the last 20 years, it remains open to off campus intruders. A closed campus is the standard in other urban area in California but has been impossible to achieve simply because “it’s Berkeley”. No other community allows their student’s safety to be undermined by liberal facists arguing civil liberties. The community has allowed a standard that is negligent towards it student’s safety.. SHAMEFUL.

  • Former parent

    That’s almost laughable. As a parent, we had problems getting other adults to supervise student’s drug use (alcohol and marijuana) on high school field trips. They thought it was wrong…

  • Former Parent

    They don’t enforce it because they are AFRAID of the students packing guns making an example of someone on campus by shooting them. What world are you living in? Perhaps a field trip to South Berkeley for a week or two might open up your world view.

  • Disgusted Former Parent

    Really? Thinking student’s should be safe at school is not in the realm of what we should be able to expect for them at Berkeley High School. Contra Costa or the South Bay doesn’t put up with this…and they are all liberal and multicultural. Only Berkeley’s view of “liberal” includes guns on campus AOK huh?

  • Doc

    But that is just the point, no other district allows registration just because some one in the district is willing to give away school access. Every other district requires the sponsor be the legal guardian and the child to live with that in district adult. Berkeley has set up a system where registration is a joke. The joke is on tax payers and the children of Berkeley.

  • Anonymous

    But there’s a great jazz band at the school. Right?

  • Bruce Love

    You are flat out wrong. Legal guardianship is not a requirement per state law. Stop making stuff up.

  • Withdowncasteyes

    Oh man, thank God I am springing for a private HS education for my kid. These are the crux years and no way would I trust BHS, bless them all, to be the best for us at this point in the history of Berkeley schooling.

  • Heather W.

    My son got out of BHS in 2004. I recently told him about the incidents; his reply ‘Mom, you don’t even know how many kids at Berkeley High have guns.” My son wasn’t a “thug” he just knew everyone — including those who carried guns. It’s been happening for decades. When I was in BHS/East Campus I knew a guy who had a gun and nearly shot off one of his testicles, but not on campus. There were some guns I knew about back then, there are many more now.

  • Hezmodo

    In the early 2000′s there was an ID policy — in fact my son was checked on numerous occasions for not wearing his ID around his neck. Somewhere, I still have his last ID. They did do this — they didn’t enforce it. I think it’s a very good idea, and thought so back then when I son bitched about it. I think this policy needs to be implemented again and ENFORCED.

  • Heather W.

    Funny you should mention that, Berkopinionator — because the BUSD is planning to do JUST THAT — right over here at the Berkeley Adult School with the “Community School” That PROMISES a small class of 15 of these kids, plus 30 more in an independent studies program.

  • hiro protagonist

    Video of the meeting posted here:

    BHS Parent Forum on Weapons Part One on Vimeo.com: http://vimeo.com/21666708
    BHS Parent Forum on Weapons Part Two on Vimeo.com: http://vimeo.com/21678294
    BHS Parent Forum on Weapons Part Three on Vimeo.com: http://vimeo.com/21674692
    BHS Parent Forum on Weapons Part Four on Vimeo.com: http://vimeo.com/21675692

  • Inside Agitator

    The DA’s office is in the prosecution business. The police are in the enforcement and apprehension businesses.

    Unless the BPD apprehends someone they think has committed a crime, the DA never hears about. If this poster asking “Does the the BPD habitually make false arrests which in turn are given to the DA to charge?” I don’t think so.

    Mat Gold rose from the audience and gave the only unmotivated substantive assessment of the problem. Without his comments the entire evening would have been a complete waste of time.

    Just another tearful performance of “Sometimes I Feel Like an Under Served Child a Long Way from My School District” by BUSD’s professional enablers.

  • rational animal

    I just read 40 or more comments and all I can say is that the level of hysteria is incredible. The gun issue is real and should and will be dealt with, but take a step back a moment before you condemn BHS. Call the College Center and check out where BHS grads get into every year before you start throwing your money at bland and lower (yes, lower) performing private schools. Stop by and watch a play, or the orchestra, or the jazz band (they’ll blow your mind). Oh yeah, in case you missed the girls BBall team almost won state. Look at the statistics on how many students not only take IB and AP tests, but pass (with high scores no less). I could of course go on and on, but I’d hate to be accused of trying to divert attention away from the real issue, which is (as I gather from all these comments) the gangster drug-dealing thug students that run the school and scare the teachers. Now, of course, not all students are part of all these accolades. Yes, it’s true, not all 3400 students are applying to Yale, rowing crew, and playing jazz at Yoshi’s while wrapping up their IB diploma. Some are just middle of the road kids. Some are struggling daily to survive. And yes, some make really terrible decisions like bringing guns to school. No matter what we do, this will still be a reality. Changes at schools (especially things like IDs and metal detectors) are, at best, window dressings for society’s problems. Think for a second how safe you’d feel if this was your first day as a freshman at BHS: You walk through a metal detector, get your card scanned, and wait to get your bag searched. Your are asked to remove your hat (shades of blue) and you are subsequently late for first period. Sound fun? Sound inviting? Sound academic? Sound like even remotely close to a solution?

  • Coco

    Lock Down!

  • Doc

    Sorry Bruce Love, go check Mill Valley, Albany, Piedmont, Accolonies or any other district that adds local funds to state ADA money. They all require that the student actually reside with the guardian and the guardian have legal responsability for the student. Berkeley is unique in allowing anyone to register any number of non-dependants.

  • Hddjeke

    Fact check the busd. For once.

  • Jimkinleung

    I’m not sure how the identification badges would help as some Berkeley High students carry the weapons. Metal detectors are also limited if access to the school is so easy that a gun could be snuck in (even I can think of multiple spots on the campus perimeter where I could toss a gun to someone). If anything, the metal detector would create a distraction. The current ‘ubiquitous’ security cameras have apparently been a limited deterrent too. I do support, however, locking down entrances that aren’t personally monitored by a security officer. The perimeter of the school also needs to be patrolled since Berkeley high students also attend classes in portables by Washington Elementary school. I have a child at Washington and don’t even want to imagine there exposure to these problems.

    Just as important – we have to address the underlying fear and reasons students are bringing weapons to school. I have heard almost nothing about the background and social circles of the students who have been arrested or how they have managed to get guns in the first place. The students themselves are the best source for understanding any problems and issues in the school environment. Regularly consulting with students alone can give an indication of unlawful gang or drug activity.

    Punishments also need to be much more severe. Besides increasing suspensions/expulsions, police and school officials need to meet with the entire family of problem students caught bringing weapons to school. Police also need to make regular lectures about what happens to students who bring any sort of weapon to school. Let’s find out which social circles are responsible for creating this mess and root them out of our schools.

    I like the idea of parents volunteering to keep an eye on the daily school activities. Regular communication between parents, students, security, and administration will be very key! The latest problems are definitely too important to let fade away until the next big offense…

  • Doc

    Every Berkeley resident has a right and duty to be critical of the performance of our schools. It is practically impossible to move classes because so many non-Berkeley students have over crowded everything. All the priority is given to achievement gap rather than developing every students to his/her best. Yes there is some quality, but not nearly in proportion to what Berkeley residents deserve if their tax funds were not diverted.

  • Bruce Love

    Sharkey, you made the absurd thing:

    However I have to say that it’s a bit shocking that a hypothetical drug-dealing baby rapist teenager with a garage full of pipe bombs who stabbed a neighbor in the eye with a rusty fork couldn’t be expelled from their school unless they comitted one of those crimes [in the course of school attendance or activity]

    Such a kid would likely be incarcerated so your hypothetical is moot and misleading.

  • Anonymous

    Looking at the law that Bruce Love cites, I see that principals are REQUIRED to immediately suspend and recommend for expulsion any students who bring a firearm onto campus, and that the governing board is REQUIRED to expel them upon finding that they have brought a firearm onto campus.

    I suggest that parents should bring some relevant excerpts from the laws to school meetings. You can find the law at
    http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=edc&group=48001-49000&file=48900-48927

    EDUCATION CODE
    SECTION 48900-48927
    .
    48915.
    (c) The principal or superintendent of schools shall immediately
    suspend, pursuant to Section 48911, and shall recommend expulsion of
    a pupil that he or she determines has committed any of the following
    acts at school or at a school activity off school grounds:
    (1) Possessing, selling, or otherwise furnishing a firearm.
    (2) Brandishing a knife at another person.
    (3) Unlawfully selling a controlled substance

    (d) The governing board shall order a pupil expelled upon finding
    that the pupil committed an act listed in subdivision (c)

    http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=edc&group=48001-49000&file=48900-48927

  • Anonymous

    Pot does not equal violence. You are taking my comments out of context. I’m saying pot when combined with money and trade often results in violence in the hands of youth.

  • Anonymous

    I’m having difficulty understanding who the “they” are in your comment. Do you mean BPD? The BPD are afraid of the students packing? BTW, I’m living in Berkeley, and have for the last 30 years. In many neighborhoods, including Alcatraz Ave.

  • Paz

    my son and a friend were mugged and robbed in the park across from BHS a couple of years ago. They were brave enough to go to the police and offer a description of the muggers, who were apparently well-known and had gotten away with many other robberies because other students were afraid to ‘snitch.’ The perpetrators were caught and I assume were expelled. But after witnessing the way my son and his friend were treated by the Berkeley PD, having to sit and wait for almost two hours to be interviewed/interrogated, I understand why some youth don’t want to deal with going to the police. One officer was helpful and retrieved my son’s stolen cell phone, but the person at the desk basically shut her window and closed up shop when her shift was over after spending time joking around with a coworker and ignoring instead of helping two young victims of a violent attack. We live in a violent society that teaches youth that war and violence are somehow means of self-defense and problem solving. That guns are now involved in robberies at BHS is disturbing and calls for strong measures; but why should all the students be punished and subjected to a prison-like atmosphere with metal detectors and guards because of the actions of a few thugs?

  • Bruce Love

    Doc, be sure to read California Education Code 48204:

    http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=edc&group=48001-49000&file=48200-48208

    “Guardian” is a court appointed role. The caretaker requirements for school admission are more general than “parent or guardian”. The district has a heavy duty of proof before they can declare a student an unlawful registrant.

    The reason that the state legislature passed 48204 was because they judged parenthood or guardianship to be too strict a requirement.

    The court precedents around 48204 are particularly interesting, by the way. Interestingly enough, Berkeley (BUSD) was party to a precedent setting case of kicking out an unlawful registrant — but it was an exceptionally egregious case.

  • Bruce Love

    Looking at the law that Bruce Love cites, I see that principals are REQUIRED to immediately suspend and recommend for expulsion any students who bring a firearm onto campus, and that the governing board is REQUIRED to expel them upon finding that they have brought a firearm onto campus.

    Quite correct. And it is exactly what happens. There is a great deal of confusion in the public over these matters. Please don’t make it worse.

  • Doc

    No other district reaches the conclusion Berkeley has. Every other schoolboard acknowledges a fiduciary responsibility to limit access to only legally entitled students.

  • Gtucker

    The DA’s office is in the prosecution business. The police are in the enforcement and apprehension business.

    Unless the BPD apprehends someone they think has committed a crime, the DA never hears about it. Doubting Mr. Golde’s assessment requires asking “Does the the BPD habitually make false arrests which in turn are given to the DA to charge?” I don’t think so.

    Mr. Golde rose from the audience and gave the only unmotivated substantive account of the problem. Without his comments the entire evening would have been a complete waste of time.

    Just another tearful performance of “Sometimes I Feel Like an Under Served Child a Long Way from My School District” by professional enablers.

  • 3rdGenBerkeleyan

    Lance aren’t you going to shut down this thread? there were over 100 comments last time about the guns at Berkeley high and you shut the thread down stating nothing new was getting posted and there were too many postings…this thread has 140 comments and counting why are you keeping this one open? not much different being said, same problem kids from other cities attending BHS bringing guns to school. I spoke to one of Berkeley’s finest yesterday and he said off the record that these kids were all from Oakland, candy coat it anyway you like it that is the problem. Berkeley kids are not bringing guns to school, Oakland kids are!!!!

  • rational animal

    “All the priority is given to achievement gap rather than developing every students to his/her best”

    *Chuckle* – I know what you’re trying to say, BUT…again with the superlatives. “All priority.” So you’re saying every decision is prefaced with “will this close the achievement gap?” Every teacher seeks not develop every student to his/her best, but to close the achievement gap? Oh, where to begin? I wasn’t even talking about this and it somehow comes out in your reply. Everyone is just itching to say something. I agree overcrowding is an issue. I agree that there should be more accountability for non-BHS students (especially given the property taxes paid by Berkeley residents). I also know a red herring when I see one. Back to the gun and perceived violence issue, there were just as many non-Berkeley residents the day a gun wasn’t found as there was the day a gun was. I hate to break it to all the keep BHS for Berkeley crowd: a large chunk, if not a majority, are Richmond and Oakland students that are very high performing and are smart and savvy enough to find a way to not send their kids to Castlemont or Kennedy and not pay for Head Royce or Marin Academy, but get them into BHS instead. This very fact should elicit a real conversation about how local control of schools has detrimental effects (i.e. zip code determining future), but it won’t. It could even trigger a conversation about working together with neighboring districts to tackle similar problems, but it won’t. Instead, we resort to some other form of logic: too many out of district kids + too much focus on the achievement gap = guns on campus = metal detectors/id cards/death of BHS. Then we’ll ask ourselves in 10 years what happened? I remember when BHS was this awesome place (see my first post), now it’s like a prison. On the bright side, they gave up on that achievement gap nonsense.

  • Bruce Love

    Other districts have lost court battles over that. You are simply wrong (about what you think counts as “legally entitled”).

  • Pieroinfante

    I would like to address everyone here.
    This subject, is not about any educational ideologies, stereotyping, profiling, or “keeping the kids in line”
    This subject is about how to run a school, and who to do when it becomes broken.

    I attended BHS in the 80′s, EVEN THOUGH I WAS NOT A REGISTERED STUDENT. and have maintained hundreds of friendships with people from the school and the city.
    I think there is a much larger problem than “those bad kids” or “those mean right wingers”

    The problem is YOU.

    Your inability to think about the safety and education of kids first. your insistence at either making them out to be evil perpetrators, or innocent angels, or even worse “misunderstood”
    I would have easily fallen into the the category described at the meeting,. I brought weapons to school.
    I fought a lot. I dealt a little weed at the park to eat, (my mom was absent and my father dead, so I raised myself)
    No one stopped us. no one questioned us. everyone defended our right to freedom.

    Now, 95 percent of my male friends, are dead or in prison, and they were completely encouraged by lax discipline, a lack of strong male figures, and a desire on the part of many adults to want to engage in “activism” on our behalf, when we despised, and ridiculed them gleefully as we went on our regular rampages.

    People defending violence among children, and denying that it exists. (I am a 100& product of the streets here and I can tell you that it is completely out of control at BHS) and then thinking themselves “leftists” or “liberals” are nothing short of a disgrace to this city, the memory of all the kids that have died because of them, and the future of children who are lower income and of color. but most of all they are a disgrace to the real ideologies of socially progressive movements, the BPP, the peace and freedom party, The Raza movement, alternative education, and to all the blood, tears, pain, and deaths sacrifice we went through here, from being spied on by Edgar J, Hoover, to getting tears gassed, shot with rubber bullets, and attacked by our of control police in the 60′s and 70′s.
    I experienced this all first hand, Lost several family members as a result. I still maintain a functional belief in social justice and activism, and based on my experiences, and the current situaton I have some much overdue news for anyone here trying to make child safety a political issues.

    You are not leftist in the slightest. so don’t front. You’re not even liberal.

    These namny pamby, pseudo liberal. wannabe leftists, frantically humping the rotted carcass of a dead and failed political theater, are going to be responsible for the next kid who gets hurt or dies at BHS.
    Responsible. period.

    These heroic liberals Will they attend the funeral themselves? probably not. will they go to the parents in person to offer condolences? Probably not. are they willing to confront a kid with a gun, or a knife, or the intercede in a fight between kids? probably not. will they go to the hospital when a kid is hurt. again, probably not.
    what they cannot come to terms with, is that THESE KIDS IN VIOLENT SITUATIONS ARE NOT FODDER OR PLAYTHINGS FOR YOUR POLITICAL THEATER OR ASPIRATIONS.
    They are flesh and blood. someone’s baby. someone brother. someone’s sister. and yes, someone’s mother or father.
    So do not try to pretend liberal activism when in reality you are showing cowardice while children’s lives are at stake. Violence cannot be tolerated in any form, penalty must result, kids HAVE to get stung early by authority to appreciate it, and kids bringing guns to school should never be allowed to go to that school ever again period.
    There ends my diatribe about the people crying foul at the idea of a totally disciplined school.
    Am I finished?
    Hardly.

    The More affluent people people living in the hills of this town, many who might consider themselves “conservative” or “moderate” possess more than enough money, to implement a vast array of plans and solutions, (which would only work when combined with the skill and drive of people who deal with street violence on a daily basis) that could make this school. not only safe for non violent kids who just want to be left alone to study, but also remedy some of the violent kids who act out here as well. It’s all there. the money. the drive. the desire. There is no :”Berkeley council on violence” which could no doubt raise millions to help all these kids.
    ‘No, people are far more concerned with Freight and Salvage’s multimillion design. or Berkeley rep’s multimillion dollar annual budget, or regular dinners at Chez Pannise, Downtown and all manner of luxuries, while the school their very own kids attend, gets less and less attention.

    That’s not conservative, that’s Just selfish. send your kid to a public school when you have money to make that school better, but no. let the city take the hit. expect for the state or nonprofits to cover it.
    The right in this town, is equally implicit in this crime against children.
    Yes I am calling it a social crime. what else can it be called? People die.
    And you too, will be remembered by history as having been affluent and in a position to help while children died in your on front yard.

    and just for the record, I know ALL the dirty, horrific, underhanded, sexually illegal, graft and embezzlement-ridden, booze and drug soaked history of the many administrations that have run BHS since the late 70′s.
    Despicable. shameful and deserving of note by name, which I will do later on.
    The kinds of the people this city has often allowed to govern their children in the most impressionable time in their lives is a complete and utter travesty.

    This is not meant to disparage the many fine and upstanding heroes of my youth like Ms. Bennett, and several of the coaches, and English teachers, and dozens and dozens of others that decided to sacrifice better careers for their love of teaching and who whose deepest desires were our safety and our education.
    I was one of the lucky ones. not without a troubled life. but still very lucky.

    So I ask this of you:
    I ask for the children, and for the future of this city, and for the future of this school a school I have loved with all my heart, from the steps, to the wall, to the gym, to the track, to theaters, to the park, to all the teachers who ever taught there and to all the students that ever studied.

    Get off of it.

    Liberals can get off their soapboxes, and Conservatives can get off their wallets.
    and if you happen to be a poor conservative, or a rich liberal then do the reverse.
    Just get off it.
    Confront violence DIRECTLY
    Its ugly. Its painstaking. Its messy. It feels thankless.

    But it is the only thing that will work.
    Hiding behind politics, or not committing financially when you have the ability to do so, both amount to the same thing. which is to say, Nothing.

    My votes?

    BAS: BAD idea unless it is tightly monitored and controlled. Period.

    It would be a better idea to separate these kids into smaller groups and send them all to different schools or programs. That is, if you know anything all about criminal science from either an academic or personal viewpoint. I do from both. massing a bunch of kids who are all in trouble into one program in one location, without the strongest of controls, will turn the school into a facility like Tracy or Chino, a crime academy, where kids only get into more trouble.

    I thank you for reading this message, and it’s many typos, and I’d like to say that I am no better than anyone I have mentioned here. I am just another confused man wanting to make change and frustrated that I sometimes cannot.
    But this, this is solvable if we can get over the tired Berkeley Liberal–Vs-Conservative bullshit.

    Piero Amadeo Infante,
    Lifelong Berkeley and Oakland Resident
    Attended BHS (sporadically, and without registering)
    1978-1981

  • http://www.davosnewbies.com lknobel

    We will close it down at some point. The previous time, it had been running for a few days. This post only went up today.