News

Berkeley joins 900 cities to condemn corporate greed

Around 300 people marched through downtown Berkeley Saturday as part of the worldwide Occupy movement. All photos: Judith Scherr

Update, 10.16.11: A video of the October 15th Occupy march in Berkeley has been added at the foot of this story. It was created by Digital Asphalt/East Bay Media Center/Paul Kealoha Blake.

…………………………………….

Some 300 people marched, biked and rolled their wheelchairs through downtown Berkeley Saturday, adding their voices to the Occupy Movement calling for an end to the abuse of corporate power. There were rallies and demonstrations in more than 900 cities in the U.S. and abroad, with a turnout of some 2,000 in Oakland and 3,000 in San Francisco.

“There ain’t no power like the power of the people, ‘cause the power of the people don’t stop,” Berkeley marchers chanted, waving homemade signs such as “No Taxes for Star Wars,” “This is Not a Recession; This is a Robbery,” and “Free Market Makes People Unfree.” Marchers walked on the sidewalk, accompanied by a couple of police officers on bicycles.

Before the march, a few people spoke briefly in the manner that has become familiar to the Occupy Movement, with the crowd repeating the speakers’ words so that they are heard by all. Elizabeth Kessell listed a dozen corporate misdeeds – bank foreclosures, workplace discrimination, misuse of animals, abrogation of worker rights, media control and more. She went on to call for solutions: “Exercise your rights to peaceable assembly,” she said. “Occupy public spaces [and] create a process to address the problems we face.”

The protestors included a number of teachers who expressed concern about cuts at schools

King Middle School teacher Thomas Sinsheimer was among the marchers. He and his wife were wearing Berkeley Federation of Teachers t-shirts. “It’s gotten to the point in this country where it’s hard for people to survive,” he said, adding that schools feel the pinch. “Class sizes are bigger and there’s less money for programs,” he said.

West Contra Costa teacher Wendy Phillips was also there, with a sign that said, “Teachers are part of the 99%.” Phillips has lost preparation time, gained five furlough days and pays higher health care costs than she used to. “We have no music,” she said. “The parents have to pay for the music by themselves.”

A few elected officials showed up to the march and rally. Rent Board member Jesse Townley pointed out how corporations hurt Berkeley renters and homeowners: “The bank’s criminality, along with government collusion in terms of letting foreclosures go through without being modified or forgiven, means that the housing stock in Berkeley is definitely negatively affected,” he said. “The wrong that is being done is by people who are not accountable to the public.”

The crowd repeats the words of the speakers so that they can be heard by all

Councilmembers Max Anderson and Kriss Worthington were both at the rally and march. Worthington said the problem of corporate power was on national, state and local levels. In Berkeley it could be seen by the difficulty the council has had in passing a ban on plastic bags. He said he’s also concerned about how corporate money influences elections. “The amount of money that corporations are allowed to spend… in state and local elections pollutes the public policy range of possibilities,” he said.

One of the many homemade signs on display

Some media have reported in recent days that the various “occupy” events have been poorly attended. Many Berkeley residents chose to go to the much larger Oakland rally, organized, in part, by Moveon.org and other national groups. Mayor Tom Bates spoke with Oakland Mayor Jean Quan at a Laney College rally, before a march to downtown Oakland to join Occupy Oakland where some 200 tents sprawl across Frank Ogawa Plaza. There, one could spot a number of people in Berkeley Federation of Teachers shirts, Berkeley activists acting as monitors, as well as Berkeley councilmember Linda Maio.

Maio said she supported the goals of the Occupy Movement and said she believes the full Berkeley City Council supports the Berkeley occupation. “People are being trampled on over and over again [by the big corporations],” she told Berkeleyside. “Finally something is happening. As long as we’re quiet, they’ll just keep doing it over and over again.” The city council will vote on whether to support Occupy Berkeley on November 6.

Meanwhile, the Berkeley encampment is moving from the Bank of America Plaza to Martin Luther King Civic Center Park, where organizers say the occupation has room to grow and can take advantage of a city portapotty.

Related:
Wall Street protests come to Berkeley [10.09.11]

Berkeleyside publishes many articles every day. To see all our stories in chronological order, and read ones you may have missed, check out our recently launched All the News grid.

Print Friendly
Tagged , ,
  • John Holland

    Now, if we could move the Downtown Merchants Association outdoor movies to the park, it would be double awesomeness!

    Stay up late watching movies, and… Voila! You’re already in bed!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Everybody-Knows/100002666808792 Everybody Knows

    One comment on one of the pictures (‘free markets leave people unfree… I am definitely in the 99% and with the movement, but I am 100% free market. The problem is that by wielding political power the US cult of corporate elite has been manipulating the market to the extreme. Are Wal Mart and Starbucks businesses that have soared based on the global free market, or have they soared based on the fact that an unfree global market controlled by biased trade agreements has relegated vast swaths of humanity to abject poverty? A free people have a free market. We currently have a market that is unfree due to confusion between people and corporations as citizens of the globe. Corporations should be groups of people freely associating to make money, not politically protected entities with human-like rights.

    But we should be careful what we wish for. Inviting people to come in and control the markets never ends well.

  • laura
  • Bruce Love

    The report above is mostly about the rally on Saturday.   There was also on Saturday a general assembly (“GA”) — it started at 2:30 (the rally at 12).   Normally the GA starts at 6pm.   The general assemblies are the consensus-based organizing tool that keeps all of the Occupy _____ efforts going.   In some sense, if you are interested in the Occupy movement, the general assemblies are where things get put in motion.   The Occupy rallies and marches are examples of direct actions planned in the GA. 

    The Oakland rally favored by the politicians and celebrities was the
    “Jobs Not Cuts” rally organized by MoveOn and various partners and
    supporters.  It was not an action by the Occupy movement.

    Some Berkeley examples of the GA in action from Saturday: the GA accepted a proposal to prioritize having basic medical supplies around for overnighters; accepted a proposal to form an education committee to research and report on issues of interest to occupiers;  declined a proposal to issue a demand that the city remove all deposits from the national banks and move them local credit unions;  accepted a proposal to set the pace of marches slow enough for everyone to keep up; and rejected a proposal to occupy the lot at Telegraph and Haste.  (There may have been other proposals – I forget.)

  • Charles_Siegel

    Basic economics tells us that the free market has failings.  Here are two of the most obvious failures and a political solution for each:

    – The market does not account for external costs, such as environmental costs.  The political solution is to ban certain types of pollution and put a price on others that makes the market account for them.  Thus, the free market would not act to control global warming, and we need to pass a carbon tax or a cap-and-trade system to put a price on greenhouse gas emissions.

    – The market does not optimize the distribution of income.  The political solution is a progressive income tax (plus earned income tax credit) that reduces inequality of income, so the 1% are less wealthy and so anyone who works hard earns a living income. 

    You are right to say that attempts to replace market economies with command-and-control economies have always failed.

    You are wrong to think that we can just leave everything to the free market.  We need mechanisms that do not abandon the market but that work with the market to correct its failings, such as the two I mention above.

  • Bruce Love

    Mother Jones has up an advocacy piece about why “foodies” should join the Occupy movement.

    http://motherjones.com/environment/2011/10/food-industry-monopoly-occupy-wall-street

    Synopsis of their reasons:

    “1. The food industry is a big fat monopoly.”
    “2. The food industry screws farmers, its own employees, and the environment.”
    “3. Wall Street’s greed leaves millions to starve — literally.”
    “4. Our politicians are in bed with agribusiness.”

    Occupy Berkeley might just be a great forum and format for organizing democratically around food security and food quality issues.

    In my opinion (beyond Mother Jones) we also need urban farming and other community resiliency advocates.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Everybody-Knows/100002666808792 Everybody Knows

    Neither of your solutions rubs my free-market proclivities the wrong way very much. Unless you institute draconian measures like restrictions on childbearing, wealth will have a tendency to concentrate over the generations. Redistribution is obviously mandatory to a degree to prevent plutocracy and monopolistic disruption of the free market (the trend we feel right now).

    It is also true that the dollar does not care about the environment, so we have to protect the environment with rules. We have to keep murder illegal, too!

    It is naive to think that Utopian anarchy could ever exist in world of essentially competing humans that are prone to using deception and group manipulation to achieve their ends. Somebody eager for power will be the first to step behind the flag of anarchy! Anyway, the few beautiful experiments in pure libertarian societies have always failed to overcome human ambition… just ask the Catalans.

    So there has to be some government, and that takes money and taxes.

    You may misinterpret me. My sole reason for commenting was to caution against overreacting to the crooks and powermongers on Wall Street by giving the reigns to a different set of crooks and powermongers.

    Collectivism has many positive sides, and feels peachy on the road in, but the ugly parts of human nature remain. Collectivism can turn ugly for all varieties of minority groups in a hurry once the idealists retire.

    So, cheers to you, Charles.

  • Anonymous

    Occupy Berkeley is mostly under attended and very filthy, and seems disorganized. They should merge with Occupy Oakland and form an Occupy East Bay.

  • libraterian

    “Occupy Ourselves!”…At last a protest movement with an honest name. Our poor pro-am protestants have struggled to stay occupied since Obama was elected. 

  • berkeleystreetman

    i thought that i was part of the 99% but after seeing these sorry losers i guess that i’m in the 1%