News

“Largest fire since 1991″ leaves many locals homeless

The Sequoia Apartment building on Saturday afternoon. The fire gutted the interiors, with floors and roof sections collapsing. Photo: Tracey Taylor

Update, 11.21.11, 9:09 am: ASUC (The Associated Students of the University of California) is organizing a Donation Drive for those displaced by the fire on Haste and Telegraph. Many of the residents of The Sequoia Apartments were students. Visit the ASUC Donation Drive Facebook page for details.

Original story: The devastating fire that tore through the Sequoia Apartment building at 2441 Haste Street Friday night and Saturday morning has left dozens of people homeless. The five-story, 39-unit building was gutted by the fire, is uninhabitable and is likely to be demolished soon.

What remains of the building, which has been red-tagged, is structurally unsafe. Firefighters were still on the scene Saturday afternoon as the site is still considered an active fire.

It has not been formally established whether everyone who lived in the building managed to get out during the fire.

“We are not totally convinced that everyone is out of there,” Berkeley’s Mayor Tom Bates said Saturday at the scene of the fire, reported by the Berkeley Daily Planet. Deputy Berkeley Fire Chief Gil Dong added the building had a history of casual tenants.

The city is working with the American Red Cross and the university to establish a final count and identify the occupants, which include families and students, in order to connect them with appropriate services. Residents should call the Fire/Police non-emergency line at 510-981-5900. Displaced residents can also call the Red Cross at 510-595-4441.

City of Berkeley spokesperson Mary-Kay Clunies-Ross told Berkeleyside: ”We’re working with the building owner to determine what are going to be the next steps. At least some deconstruction will be necessary to completely extinguish the fire. Also, there is a lot of unreinforced masonry, so that is an issue as well.”

Because the building is hazardous, the intersection of Haste and Telegraph will be closed to traffic through the weekend and likely beyond. There is some pedestrian access to some of the nearby businesses. “We’re working with AC Transit to redirect bus routes and are developing a traffic plan to help people maneuver around the intersection,” Clunies-Ross said.

The fire department has not yet determined the cause of the fire. Access to the building, which is owned by Greg and Kenneth Ent, is deemed unsafe.

Deputy Fire Chief Dong said the fire, which burned for more than 17 hours, was the biggest one he could remember in his career after the 1991 Oakland-Berkeley Firestorm.

While principally a traumatic experience for the building’s residents, the fire is also a blow to the Telegraph Avenue business owners who have been campaigning to have the vacant lot opposite the Sequoia building cleaned up and potentially developed. The site, which is owned by Ken Sarachan, has been vacant since the early 1990s, has been overrun by rats and is seen as a blight on the neighborhood. Local merchants now face the prospect of two vacant lots facing each other on Telegraph at Haste.

Berkeleyside readers who wish to help people who have lost possessions and their home in the fire should contact the Red Cross directly at 510-595-4441.

Related:
Devastating fire in apartment building, Haste at Telegraph [11.19.11]
City hands ultimatum to Sarachan on vacant Telegraph lot [09.07.11]
The rats of Telegraph Avenue (video) [01.28.11]  

Print Friendly
Tagged , , , ,
  • Ex-tenant

    The owners of this building (Mr Ent and son) have neglected the maintenance of this building for decades – I gave up fighting them in the late 90′s and moved out – from what I hear nothing had changed – hope his fire insurance covers his tenants but knowing how cheap they are, I doubt it.

  • Anonymous

    Tenants, I believe, are responsible for insuring their own household goods. Every renter should have insurance in the event of fire or other unforeseeable disaster that will leave them without household goods and cover temporary shelter, moving costs, etc. Renter insurance is not very expensive.

    If this landlord has, as you say — and I believe you, neglecetd maintenance, there might be some liability but pursuing the landlord for negligence would take many years in court. It’s not right but it’s a tough slog.

  • Janice

    yeah, its all this area needs… another vacant lot and less people traffic for its near by merchants… and of course such a blow to it’s own residents…  the city really needs to get on Ken (the owner of many buildings in the area including the vacant lot across the st from the fire and the old Codys building) to develop some beneficial usage of these spaces… from what i have heard the city has been turning a blind eye to his shinanigans for years… and maybe, are just now applying some heat… anyway, very unfortunate event. i wish all whom it affects the best in rebounding…

  • Kaiser

    Great, I can just see Sarachan buying that property too and letting it sit for a decade or more. Eventually all of Telegraph Ave will turn into empty buildings or vacant lots (except for Rasputin) unless the city counsel stops turning a blind eye his way, and allowing him to purchase property with no plan to actually put it to use.

  • formertenant

    Here’s hoping for a long and thorough investigation of the fire and that the Ents step up and share the wealth to help the tenants regardless of insurance. Fire the day of an inspection? I guess they have their answer.

  • http://www.facebook.com/danwoloz Dan Woloz

    I’m sad at the loss of housing, the loss of a historic building and the prospect of another vacant hole in a commercial district. Fortunate however no one was hurt

  • Charles_Siegel

    I wonder if the city could create a very small redevelopment zone around this corner, so it could acquire buildings by eminent domain and sell them to developers. 

    The city has to declare an area blighted to create a redevelopment zone, and there is no doubt that the area right around this corner is blighted, with a vacant lot, a vacant storefront, and now what will become another vacant lot. 

    There has been very stiff political opposition to declaring large redevelopment areas in Berkeley, but the area right around this corner is so obviously in need of help that I think there would be political support for making it a redevelopment area.

    Does anyone know how small a redevelopment area can be by state law?

  • David

    If developers were allowed to build what customers wanted to rent, building would occur pronto. Its only as development is held hostage to social enginering that such blocks go vacant.

  • Emmalou

    Will there be a way to compensate the neighboring small business owners who have to stay closed because they are too close to the danger zone?  

  • Charles_Siegel

    You obviously have not been reading the news reports about why the lot across the street from here remains vacant.  

  • Berkeleytard

    Sarachan probably lit the fire .. all part of his master plan to marginalize Amoeba and feed his grudge.
    I think it’s time to declare eminent domain on the Telegraph Redevelopment Zone.

  • http://radar.oreilly.com/2007/09/local-recycle-reuse-hits-a-bur.html The Sharkey

    The Berkeley Daily Planet will put all their weight against it.

  • Berkeleytard

    BS, your comment moderation is arbitrary and stupid.

  • David

    The owner has asked to build a Pagoda structure, but the city doesn’t want him to make a profit. Anything else?

  • Charles_Siegel

    As the owner himself said at the time:

    “It’s going to cost way too much, and I’m looking for co-investors who
    want to lose a lot of money for sure,” he quips. “So far I haven’t found
    any.” 

    and

    “I’m serious in that I’ve spent a lot of time and money on it, but that
    doesn’t mean it will actually occur,” he said. “There are about a
    hundred ways it could not get built, and about a hundred things would
    have to go right for it to get built. If I were a betting person, I
    would bet that it never gets built.”

    http://www.berkeleydailyplanet.com/issue/2007-08-14/article/27755?headline=Pagodas-on-Telegraph-

  • David

    Ahh yes the Daily Planet. They were sort of like almost a source occasionally for news. Particularly fair and neutral when it came to developers and the University.

  • aenar

    I see arson and Patrick Kennedy stepping in the redevelop with 300k condos. Why, I dunno.
    Maybe its just my experience with the city management…

  • Columbo

    Someone should wake up the detective over there at BPD and have him test Sarachan’s fingers for  lighter fluid.

  • Charles_Siegel

    Interesting comment in the Daily Planet by Kirk Peterson (my favorite Berkeley architect):

    The City needs to have a qualified engineer—one who works on
    historic masonry buildings—look at the ruin before it’s swept away with no
    proper review. It should be noted that it’s a prime development site WITH THE
    RUINS, because it’s an existing approved building envelope – probably no EIR
    and all that to encumber a reconstruction. Maybe the local business folks would
    like a quick reconstruction process rather than a slow new-project one.
    Financing for housing projects is practically nil these days…………….of
    course UC could buy the site.

    http://berkeleydailyplanet.com/issue/2011-11-20/article/38883?headline=Berkeley-Needs-Qualified-Engineer-to-Review-Fire-Damaged-Historic-Masonry-Building–By-Kirk-Peterson

  • Mike Farrell

    Its called insurance.