What’s in a name? In Berkeley, a lengthy process

Park and other public facility names will be subject to a new city policy. Photo: Berkeley Partners for Parks

At next Tuesday night’s City Council meeting, a seemingly uncontentious item suggests that Berkeley adopt a formal policy for the naming and renaming of public facilities.

A simple matter that can swiftly be handled before the Council proceeds to more important matters, yes? Not quite.

The attempt to create a naming process that updates the existing 1973 policy has been wending its way through various committees and commissions since December, 2000, when the Council asked the Parks & Recreation commission to develop a new proposal.

A detailed resolution made it to the commission in October, 2003. The Council took the commission’s recommendation and created a subcommittee. A 2005 memo from Mayor Tom Bates recommends the subcommittee “begin discussion of establishing a policy to name public facilities”.

And, at last, here we are, 12 years later. 

“It’s sort of funny that people thought it was so controversial,” said Councilmember Kriss Worthington, a sponsor of the new policy, along with Mayor Bates and Councilmember Linda Maio. “Once Tom, Linda and I sat down, we were able to reach consensus pretty rapidly.”

The policy requires newly acquired or developed public facilities be named “immediately after acquisition or development to ensure appropriate public identity”. Under the policy, facilities can only be named for a living person with a two-thirds vote of the City Council. Further, the City “encourages the recognition of individuals for their service to the community in ways that include the naming of activities such as athletic events, cultural presentations, or annual festivals, which do not involve the naming or renaming of public facilities”.

There is a stated bias in the policy to long-standing names: “proper weight should be given to the fact that: a name lends a site or property authenticity and heritage; existing names are presumed to have historic significance; and historic names give a community a sense of place and identity, continuing through time, and increases the sense of neighborhood and belonging”.

Worthington said that part of the spur for action after such a long time was the death of Bill Lipsky, who had been instrumental in creating the “tot lot” in Willard Park. Many neighborhood people, he said, were talking about an appropriate way to commemorate Lipsky’s role.

“It helped motivate getting this moving along now,” Worthington said.

Print Friendly
Please keep our community civil. Comments should remain on topic and be respectful.
Read our full comments policy »
  • Anonymous

    @Berkeleyside:disqus, this is mildly interesting in an “oh that quirky Berkeley” sort of way, but I SO wish you would use your fourth estate access to Worthington, Maio, Bates and others to press for details on some more weighty matters such as…
    What’s the plan for fixing those streets?  

    What’s up with labor relations:  will the (over?) generous pensions beggar us forever?

    What was the final price tag for policing and now repairing the Occupy mess the Council invited into town?  From what budget will that be paid and at the expense of what other programs?

    And (from way out in left field), what, if any, thinking is going on downtown about how to promote electric vehicle adoption in neighborhoods where residents rely on street parking (and so can’t run house power to recharge) ?  Could there be some kind of metered charging stations curbside?  

  • Writing this doesn’t exclude the other stories you suggest. A number of them are, in fact, in the works. 

    On streets, we wrote about the suggested plans in November: We’ll keep following that through to whatever action the City Council decides on. 

    We’re always eager to hear from readers about the things we should be covering. Thanks. 

  • Charles_Siegel

    I have to confess that I am the one who convinced the city to adopt the name “Ohlone Greenway.”  My friend, Steve Price, convinced El Cerrito to name the path under the BART tracks in that city Ohlone Greenway.  I don’t know who convinced Albany.  Finally, I convinced Berkeley, so the entire path would have a consistent name. 

    I think Malcolm Margolin would approve.

  • Heather W.

    Gee, Charles you have a lot of sway!

  • Charles_Siegel

    I actually tried to do it because I thought it would be easy.  I didn’t expect anyone to object – and no one did.  Maybe that was a first in Berkeley.