News

Executive order stymies Daily Cal’s bid to get funding

The Daily Californian is independent of the university it covers, a sticking point for student government

A bid by UC Berkeley’s ailing student newspaper, The Daily Californian, to source direct financial support from the university’s student body has been felled, following an eleventh-hour decision by student government group ASUC to make student voting on the issue void.

Vishalli Loomba, president of the Associated Students of the University of California (ASUC), issued an executive order this morning invalidating an initiative on the 2012 ASUC general election ballot that asked students to support The Daily Californian, saying it violated UC policy.

The VOICE initiative, which called for students to agree to a $2/semester fee being added to their general fees, would have boosted the Daily Cal’s coffers by $93,800. The newspaper is struggling financially as it is facing a budget deficit of $200,000.

Loomba’s order came as the second of three voting days for the election was under way. The justification for the order was a UC policy that states that the student referendum process “shall not be used to establish a new fee for the purpose of supporting a non-university organization.”

Tomer Ovadia, Editor in Chief of the Daily Cal, said the move had come as a shock. “It came out of nowhere,” he said. “We met with the ASUC President yesterday and six hours later they issued the order.”

Ovadia added that staff on the paper were demoralized. “It takes a lot of work to get a referendum on the ballot. This has derailed a year’s worth of effort that was knocked down in a matter of hours.”

The issue of The Daily Cal’s affiliation to the university was raised when the paper met with the University of California Office of the President (UCOP) several months ago while the publication was preparing the referendum. The newspaper has been independent of the university since 1971, but is considered a “student group” that can issue flyers and reserve rooms on campus. UCOP suggested it could draft a memorandum of understanding that would make clear the publication’s status. That did not materialize.

Loomba said that both campus officials and officials from the UC president’s office have said that such a memorandum could impact the Daily Cal’s independence and financial oversight.

Attempts to reach Loomba by the time of publication had been unsuccessful.

While more than 1,700 students signed a petition in favor of the fee referendum, it also had its opponents. In an editorial in the Daily Cal, Andrew David King of the Berkeley Poetry Review and Myles Moscato of CalTV said the ballot item did damage to the notion of a free and competitive publications market.

Ovadia said The Daily Cal intends to remain independent and that this was made very clear on the VOICE initiative. “Students were only going to get what they approved,” he said. “We told them we would maintain our independence. No-one cherishes our independence more than us.”

The issue will next be discussed by the student Senate which has the power to overturn the executive order and is meeting tonight.

[Full disclosure: Berkeleyside competes with the Daily Californian for online advertising.]

Related:
Daily Californian blank page might be harbinger of the future [04.10.12]
The Daily Cal: Berkeley’s student paper at a tipping poing [04.06.12]

Print Friendly
Tagged ,
  • http://stefanco.com Stefan Lasiewski

    The justification for the order was a UC policy that states that the student referendum process “shall not be used to establish a new fee for the purpose of supporting a non-university organization.”

    If I remember right, this policy was implemented in the early 1990s. Back then, UC students had an option check a box and give money to Calpirg. It was pretty controversial among UC students, and even Ralph Nader spoke about it.

    My memory is fuzzy, but here is some information about that:

    http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/articles/9106170425/nader-attacks-decision-end-coercive-funding-mechanism-that-funded-calpirg

  • Jonathan

    I can’t say I’m very surprised. There was no love lost between the ASUC and the Daily Cal when I was a writer there a decade ago. I think the two organizations have always been at war — journalists and politicians in training :-) The campus will be worse off without the Daily Cal, that is for sure.

  • Dh

    Just wondering…is that photo of the pepper spray retouched? Is it really orange like that? And so visible?

  • Bruce Love

    I don’t know what was done to that image but on the video, at the time, yes it looks very visible and very orange.

    At the time, some journalists tracked down the exact model of pepper spray container the officer is using.   It’s not your run of the mill pepper-spray.  It’s very high strength.   The officer is actually arguably using it improperly in that shot, deploying it that close.

    Not to shill for them, but, this stuff:

    http://www.amazon.com/Defense-Technology-56895-Stream-Pepper/dp/B0058EOAUE/

    (The comments are amusing.)