Dozens rally to save Berkeley’s historic post office

About 100 people gathered outside the main Berkeley post office to protests its planned sale. Photo: Charlotte Wayne

Dozens of people carrying banners and outrage turned up at the Main Post Office on Allston Way Tuesday evening, to rally against its planned sale and celebrate its “almost 100th” birthday.

Holding signs that read “Stop the Sale,” “Save Our Historic Post Office Building,” “Don’t Sell Our Labor History,” about 100 people expressed dismay that the United States Postal Service intended to sell the 1914 historic building and move retail operations to another site downtown.

Gary Brechin, a historian who has written extensively about historic post offices, rallied the crowd by describing the importance of the post offices around the country that were built in an era of government expansion. Now dozens of those buildings, from the New Deal era and earlier, have been put up for sale, part of a Congressional plan to privatize the post office and an “old fashioned 19th century land grab of the 21st century,” he said. Brechin encouraged the crowd to fight back.

“What we are going to do here is build a national coalition to take our property and our post office back,” said Brechin, who is hoping to set up meetings with other communities whose post offices have been put up for sale. These include  Palo Alto, Burlingame, San Rafael, Modesto, Ukiah, La Jolla, and Venice.

The protest outside the post office at 2000 Allston Way, which was built in 1914. Photo: Charlotte Wayne

The Berkeley City Council had been expected to adopt a resolution Tuesday night asking the USPS to stop the sale, but the meeting was cancelled because the elevator in Old City Hall was broken. But City Councilmember Laurie Capitelli told the crowd he expected the measure to pass on July 31.

“We will not be urging the post office to sell the building,” said Capitelli. “We will be urging the post office to take it off the market.”

If the experience of other communities is any guide, Berkeley will have a difficult time stopping the sale of the building at 2000 Allston Way. Under increasing pressure from Congress to cut expenses, the USPS has listed about 40 historic post offices for sale and has sold about 12 of them. Even though many communities have protested, stating that the historic buildings served as an essential part of creating a vibrant downtown, the USPS has gone through with the sales. In June, the National Trust for Historic Preservation declared historic post offices to be placed on the 2012 list of American’s Most Endangered Buildings.

Augustine Ruiz, a spokesman for the USPS who attended the rally, said a few historic post offices slated for closure had been saved, including one in the Veteran’s Home in Yountville and one in Oakville. But those post offices fell under a different USPS cost-cutting program, one that sought to close or shorten hours in rural locations.

One reason it has been difficult to stop the sale of historic post offices is that the USPS often categorizes them as relocations rather than closures, according to Steve Hutkins, who runs the website SavethePostOffice.com. The laws of regulating the relocation of services from a historic property to a smaller, nearby retail site are laxer than the laws regulating closures, he said.  And since the USPS cannot legally close distribution centers, it often first moves that portion of operations out of a historic building and then claims the building is underutilized. The USPS is planning to move the distribution services from the Allston Way location to a distribution center on Eighth Street.

There is really no way to appeal the decision since the Postal Regulatory Commission, which oversees the USPS, has declined to consider community’s formal protests.

There are already a few Berkeley organizations that are rumored to be intrigued by the idea of moving into the old Post Office. One postal worker, who asked not to be named, said that representatives from the downtown Berkeley YMCA, located right across the street, had already been by to look at the building. Fran Galletti, the CEO of the YMCA of the Central Bay Area, has not returned calls for comment at time of publication.

The rally drew a number of candidates for office including Jacquelyn McCormick, who is running for mayor, Sophie Hahn, who is running against Laurie Capitelli, and Adolfo Cabral, who is running against Darryl Moore.

Related:
Chances are slim of saving Berkeley post office
[07.23.12]
Op/Ed: Berkeley needs to wake up to loss of post office [7.16.12]
Second postal site in Berkeley for sale [07.09.12]
Postal service plans sale of Berkeley’s main post office [06.25.12]
A plea to save Park Station post office [04.07.11]
Sacramento Street post office to close [04.06.11]

Print Friendly
Tagged , ,
  • The Sharkey

    Tell ya what, how about the folks who want to save the Post Office in its current location work together to collect enough donations and grants to buy the building from the USPS, and then gift it back to the USPS so they can keep it open.

    While they’re at it, maybe they can somehow convince the counter employees there to stop being some of the worst public servants in the greater Bay Area.

  • Salmon

    You really don’t have a life, do you…..?

  • Charles_Siegel

     Right.  And when John Muir wanted to save Yosemite as a national park, he should have worked to collect enough donations to buy the land.

  • Guest

    Alternate solution that is a win-win for the community and the post office. Find someone to buy the post office, lease back whatever space in the building USPS needs, then rent out the rest to specialty shops, restaurants, etc. The foot traffic from the post office benefits the businesses, the foot traffic for the business will benefit the post office. Since most of the ground floor is one big open space and the building already is ADA compliant, tenant improvements for businesses locating there should be fairly inexpensive.

  • Charles_Siegel

     That is the best solution by far.  Come up with a development package that works economically – which would involve expanding virtually all of the building so it can be used for speciality shops, restaurants, housing, or whatever.  Keep the front facade as is, and lease back enough space to the post office so they can keep the current lobby where stamps are sold.

    I hope someone can come up with a workable proposal that does this.

  • Completely_Serious

     Yeah, that’ll work.  Check out accompanying article on Berkeley Iceland.  Didn’t SBI promise to raise a bunch of money to buy it from the Zamboni family.  Maybe Berkeley residents only want to save stuff if someone else pays for it.  Hmmmm.

    “Look kids, here’s the window where I mailed gramma’s birthday card just before she died.  And over here, I bought my very first book of self stick stamps.  Oh, how I long to take stamp glue again. Oh, oh, oh!  Here’s where I filled out my passport application back in 1964, when only intellectuals went to Europe.”

    Berkeley, the most nostalgic place on earth.

  • PragmaticProgressive

    Berkeley, the most nostalgic place on earth.

    I think it’s time for a t-shirt design contest featuring this tagline.

  • PragmaticProgressive

    PS On the back of my t-shirt, I’d like to add another truism that I think nicely sums up the situational ethics and general sense of entitlement that plagues our town:

    Berkeley: from each, according to his ability, to me, according to my needs.

  • Charles_Siegel

     Seems that development politics in Berkeley is dominated by two groups:

    – NIMBYs who are against all change.

    – People who just want to criticize the NIMBYs rather than making constructive proposals. 

  • The Sharkey

    That’s not a fair comparison and you know it, Charles.

    The Yosemite wilderness is a one-of-a-kind natural wonder that would have been destroyed if it hadn’t been protected by the government.

    The Berkeley Post Office is a one-of-a-kind building that, thanks to Berkeley’s extremely strict guidelines for historic properties, will have to be preserved no matter who the next owner is.

  • The Sharkey

    – People like you who criticize people who make constructive proposals that you don’t think are realistic enough.

  • Anon

    Brilliant!  Love the sentiment.

  • Anon

    Would anyone venture to guess the median age of the post office protestors pictured above?  How many of these same  grey panthers, 30-40 years ago, were militating to overthrow the establishment and to “renew the earth” in a new image?

  • Tim

    Completely childish. Respect, consideration and responsibility for cultural heritage are first principles of adulthood. Not all buildings are worth saving. This one is. It was built with sacrifice and devotion to the noble cause of a real public service and its form and details manifest the ideals it was built for. It was built to last, built by your parents and grandparents for coming generations–for you–that you might enjoy the benefits of civic life and a true republic.

  • The Sharkey

    There is no indication that a sale of the property would result in a destruction of the building. It’s already been designated a historic structure. It’s not going to be destroyed if it gets sold to a private company.

    The USPS is a horrible custodian of the building. Signs are taped up everywhere, the lobby is cramped with messy piles of materials and vending machines, and the employees are nasty and rude and make “enjoying the benefits of civic life and a true republic” virtually impossible.

  • Tim

    You invoke the position, “Okay, you can have my body but don’t you dare touch my soul,” except in your case you’re also happy to jettison the soul, which is the spirit of public service. Sorry you’ve had bad experiences with demoralized postal workers. In my 54 years living in Berkeley I’ve found postal workers to be mostly helpful and eager to honor their duty. Maybe the ones you’ve encountered are fed up with trying to help people who denigrate public servants–from you to their bosses, the USPS Board of Misgoverners. 

  • Chrisjuricich

    Turn it into a commercial kitchen with small restaurants surrounding it–and the USPS can rent space from it. A space for the pop-up restaurants to get their legs.

    Ha. Well, why not.

  • Tim

    Yes, it’s a cause ADULTS stand up for. Isn’t it ironic — the “establishment” turned out to be for destroying the republic established by people like Ben Franklin? They may not want to hear it, but these Berkeley citizens are true republicans, conservatives and patriots–as are you, I expect, if you’d stop to think about it.

  • Charles_Siegel

    Note that I did make a proposal for the Post Office that is constructive and realistic.

    Your proposal for private fund raising to purchase it and gift it to the post office is far from realistic.  You might as well say that people who want the streets paved should raise the funds themselves and gift them to the city.

  • Charles_Siegel

     I know the comparison is an exaggeration.  I used it to criticize your point that anyone who wants a public benefit should raise the funds for it privately. 

    If the public benefits, then it is reasonable for the public to pay.  Are you familiar with the free-rider problem that your proposal would obviously cause if it were applied generally?

  • The Sharkey

    The postal workers at the office on San Pablo are great. My mail carriers have been great everywhere I’ve lived in Berkeley. The ones who work the main counter at the downtown office, however, are poison personified.

    If you’ve been having good experiences at the front window of the downtown Post Office, then you’ve in the extreme minority.

  • Tim

    Don’t you see you’re turning that into a reason to enable the dismantling of the entire postal service? An extreme case of cutting off your nose to spite your face. That’s totally absurd–as well as irresponsible–thinking. You can’t possibly expect such a position to be taken seriously.

  • The Sharkey

    Ben Franklin also owned slaves. Not every system or idea he endorsed should be preserved in the modern era.

    The sale of a couple buildings won’t destroy the republic. Moving the main post office to a different part of town (maybe even to a facility that has convenient parking for visitors?!?) won’t make the original building suddenly explode.

    You’re better off sticking to the architectural and cultural heritage stuff. Extrapolating the collapse of the United States of America from the suggested sale of an outdated building in lil’ ol’ Berkeley, California seems a bit nutty.

  • The Sharkey

    Extrapolating the collapse of the entire Postal Service from the suggested sale of an outdated building in lil’ ol’ Berkeley, California seems a bit nutty.

  • The Sharkey

    Paving the streets is a constant and pressing need.

    Keeping this specific post office in that specific location is what this group would prefer but is not in any way necessary to its function.

  • The Sharkey

    The public does not benefit any more from the post office being in this specific location than it would from the post office being in a different location. In fact, with the changes in the way the postal service has been used over the last 100 years, a different building might be of more service to the public than the one currently being used.

    It’s an unquestionably beautiful building, and it absolutely needs to be preserved, but that doesn’t mean that it fits the current use for the USPS as well as it could.

  • The Sharkey

    Hey, I like it! Cheap, rentable kitchen space that complies with local & federal regulations and maybe has a shop in front where people can sell the things they create would be awesome. A culinary version of something like TechShop in Berkeley’s downtown would be amazing.

  • Tim

    There’s the problem: you’re not much of a patriot. “Ben Franklin also owned slaves.” So did Thomas Jefferson. That doesn’t invalidate the Declaration of Independence. Nor does the fact that the privatization agenda, relentlessly pursued since the Reagan administration, has completely escaped your notice mean that it doesn’t exist. Your points are irrelevant to what has for decades now been one of the central questions of public discourse in this country. The real argument is whether or not the p.o. should be privatized. THAT’s what this is about. Why don’t you visit the Cato Institute site for the privatization side of the argument? Ever hear of Milton Friedman, Ayn Rand, Grover Norquist? I suggest you do some research on these names and their influence among our policy makers today. Then if you’re going to take the privatization side–which you are now doing by default due to ignorance–then say so and make reasoned arguments.

    And as you educate yourself, don’t forget the public interest: read this on the p.o.– http://www.hightowerlowdown.org/node/2927

    Maybe it’ll awaken in you a little patriotism.

  • Anon

    It’s also called rank hypocrisy if when you were young and gay, you advocated the overthrow of the establishment, “The Man” and the “system” and now you dust off your protest slogans to defend a superannuated building which is far out of scale of the actual need for a post office in today’s downtown Berkeley.

  • The Sharkey

    There’s the problem: you’re not much of a patriot. “Ben Franklin also
    owned slaves.” So did Thomas Jefferson. That doesn’t invalidate the
    Declaration of Independence.

    No, it doesn’t.
    But it does make me take pause and look at what they said and advocated with a critical eye instead of just blindly worshiping everything they did just because they fall into the group of Founding Fathers.

    This isn’t an article about the privatization of the Post Office. This is an article about the potential sale of one building. Selling it won’t privatize the USPS, and Berkeley’s Post Office will be a public institution in whatever building it ends up in.

  • Tim

    1) This may be the first time a Berkeley activist has been accused of “blindly worshiping everything the founding fathers did.” You’ve taken another turn into absurdity.

    2) It’s one article in the bigger story of privatization. You need to do your homework and see the bigger picture.

  • Tim

     Who was this reply meant for?

  • Charles_Siegel

    “Paving the streets is a constant and pressing need.”

    Extrapolating the collapse of the United States of America from the unpaved potholes in the streets of lil’ ol’ Berkeley, California, seems a bit nutty.

    If you think having smooth asphalt is more important than having an attractive city, then you should start a private group to raise the money for paving.

  • Enough already!

    If you guys are gonna fight to the bitter end over who gets the last word, can it be me, and can we be done with it? No one is budging in their arguments, and this is getting ridiculous!

    LAST WORD RIGHT -> HERE!

  • Charles_Siegel

    I think both sides are taking extreme positions, as is common in Berkeley politics.

    One side says that selling the post-office is part of a conservative program of privatization that is destroying the public realm.  I agree that the conservatives’ war on the public realm is dangerous, but that is not the issue here.  The post office is losing business to the internet: mail has declined 25% since its peak, so the post office is down-sizing now for the same reason Western Union downsized after the telephone was invented.  You are harming the battle against privatization by tying it to defense of a declining technology, and you would be much more successful is you emphasized the biggest and newest threats to the public realm, such as fracking and climate change.

    The other side says there is no reason to preserve this building as a post office, though there is an obvious architectural value not only to the building but also the the lobby that provides retail service.  They give no argument at all for why it would be better to provide retail service in some other location.  Their only “argument” is guilt by association: “I dislike the sort of people who are defending the building, and therefore I dislike the building.”

    In fact, there is also a moderate position that I mentioned in a comment on an earlier article:

    I
    think it might be practical to keep the current lobby and windows as
    the retail space that the Post Office is planning to keep in downtown
    Berkeley.

    But to do that, someone would have to put together a package that
    works economically for some developer who buys the property, develops
    most of it as housing, shopping or some other use, and leases the lobby
    and windows to the Post Office.

    I think this would be the best alternative, if someone could put it
    together.  It would be good to keep that use in the Post Office lobby,
    which is the sort of dignified civic space that we need to keep.

    It seems sad to me that two commenters (including me) have made this constructive and moderate suggestion, while there have been endless angry comments by people at the two extremes.

  • PragmaticProgressive

    With respect to your alternative, I think it is interesting to imagine how each of the candidates for mayor would fare in the role of bureaucratic midwife to the package you described.

    Bates and McCormick could pull it off. Worthington would fail utterly.

    To the extent that “progress” is about moving things forward right here, in the world in which we live, those who claim that Worthington is an effective “progressive” should really re-examine their position.

  • anonymous

    Just another creepy comment from the wonderful commenters on berkeleyside.

  • The Sharkey

     

    Extrapolating the collapse of the United States of America from the
    unpaved potholes in the streets of lil’ ol’ Berkeley, California, seems a
    bit nutty.

    Good thing I never suggested that, eh?

  • The Sharkey

    Nobody’s forcing you to read it.

  • 4Eenie

    Ouch. Good point, The Sharkey.

  • Foo

     Definitely, let’s move the post office out to a greenfield site far from downtown, with lots of free parking so Sharkey can drive there and park free, as is his right as an American.