Berkeley neighbors’ bid to halt Starbucks stumbles


Independent coffee shop Mokka, which is two blocks south of the proposed new Starbucks at 3001 Telegraph Ave. supports an appeal lodged by neighbors, many of whom are loyal customers. Photo: Tracey Taylor

An attempt by a group of South Berkeley neighbors to halt, or at least delay, the arrival of a Starbucks at 3001 Telegraph Ave. (at the intersection with Ashby) stumbled last week when the city’s Zoning Adjustments Board denied its appeal.

The Bateman Neighborhood Association and Jim Smith, of Dana Street, had collected 1,500 signatures on a petition presented, along with an appeal, to ZAB in late March for the new coffee shop, which is planning to go into the new Telegraph Gardens development. The appeal focuses on concerns about traffic congestion and what are seen as unfair waivers given to Starbucks regarding the provision of parking spaces. The community is also worried about what the presence of a Starbucks will mean in terms of competition to the independently owned Mokka coffee shop two blocks away at 3075 Telegraph.

Last Thursday night, in a close 5-4 vote, the board rejected the appeal by neighbors who questioned the permits granted to the project for extended operating hours and an exception for required parking spots. City staff said it’s common to grant parking exceptions when certain criteria are met — such as ample parking nearby and when the business aims to be “neighborhood-serving” and increase pedestrian activity. Staff said the application did meet those criteria, but numerous community members who spoke against the permits questioned that determination.

Neighbors turned out in droves before the zoning board to express their lack of support for a Starbucks at Ashby and Telegraph avenues in Berkeley. Photo: Emilie Raguso

Neighbors turned out before the zoning board to express their lack of support for a Starbucks at Ashby and Telegraph avenues in Berkeley — including, far right, Mokka owner Michael Iida. Photo: Emilie Raguso

Many of the more than 20 residents who spoke said they felt the Starbucks application had received special treatment, such as a lack of neighborhood notification and public hearings; city staff said it had not. Staff brought up the example of a relatively new coffee shop on Dwight Way where the requirement for four parking spots had been waived. Staff said the same process had been followed as far as posted notification and mailings.

Given the size of the proposed new Starbucks, the coffee shop chain needed to provide a total of seven off-street parking spaces as part of its application for an administrative use permit. It said that it would have four off-street parking spaces — available to employees only — inside the building at 3001 Telegraph and the city waived a further three that would normally have been required, citing the fact that many customers and staff would be using public transit or be on foot.

Smith said he would like to see the city do a “credible analysis” of the coffee shop’s impact on traffic congestion and parking. “Without data, how was ZAB able to reach this decision,” he said.


Michael Iida, owner of Mokka coffee shop close to where the new Starbucks is likely to open, said he understands competition, but he is concerned about its impact on his customer base. Photo: Tracey Taylor

Michael Iida, who owns Mokka, told Berkeleyside while he doesn’t welcome it, he understands competition. He said he stayed neutral when the nearby Whole Foods talked about switching out the flower store on its property for a coffee shop, and then eventually introduced a coffee stand. “As owners, they have a right to do that,” he said. But he believes he will lose customers to Starbucks — including people driving by who recognize the Starbucks brand, and hospital staff for whom the walk to get coffee at Starbucks will be shorter.

In the past few weeks Starbucks has distributed fliers in the neighborhood that speak of the chain being a good neighbor and bringing 25 new jobs to Berkeley. “We’re excited at the possibility of Starbucks being a positive addition to the south side of Berkeley and providing a convenience to the surrounding medical offices, hospital and adjacent neighborhoods,” it states.

A spokesperson for Starbucks, Danny Cowan, said this action was taken to share details of our proposed store, which they expect will “generate pedestrian traffic that will benefit neighborhood merchants.” He said Starbucks had been part of the Berkeley community for 19 years (the city currently has three stores) and that they had heard interest from customers for a new store  in this area, although he said it was anecdotal.

Photo: Tracey Taylor

The proposed new Starbucks will go into the new Telegraph Gardens development at Telegraph and Ashby. Photo: Tracey Taylor

The owner of the building at 3001 Telegraph Ave., Avi Nevo, reached out to Iida at Mokka in March to say he was not insensitive to his concerns, and that his goal is to create a pedestrian-friendly environment, as he has done at other Berkeley locations. In a letter sent to him on March 20, he addressed some of the issues in contention, and wrote: “We hope that through synergy all parties will expand by drawing more patrons to the area. Cafés make the neighborhood a more desirable place to walk around, which will bring more foot traffic to both locations.” He concluded: “This site had been an eyesore for many years, and now we have the chance to create a more vibrant and lively neighborhood. Please join me in giving all of our new neighbors a warm welcome.”

Smith said the neighbors would regroup following the ZAB vote. He said an appeal to the Berkeley City Council was likely, though a final decision hadn’t been made.

Starbucks planning to open a new store in Berkeley (03.15.13)

Additional reporting to this story was contributed by Berkeleyside staffer Emilie Raguso.

Would you like to have latest Berkeley news in your email inbox once a day? Click here to subscribe to Berkeleyside’s free Daily Briefing.

Print Friendly
Tagged , , , , , ,
Please keep our community civil. Comments should remain on topic and be respectful.
Read our full comments policy »
  • Starbucks ain’t bad

    Please, “not enough parking spaces for a coffee shop”? Coffee shops which are based on catering to locals should have no parking spaces. We don’t want to facilitate more traffic in this already horribly congested area. Same for employee parking – pay enough to hire locals rather than some minimum wage commuter from Antioch. Why doesn’t the community get upset about all the new building facades up against the sidewalk. Whatever happened to setbacks, or open spaces, or outdoor tables for that matter?

  • Sylvio

    in my many visits, I’ve never had a good espresso at Mokka, or friendly service for that matter. Granted, the coffee at Starbucks is also sub-par.

  • EarlyMorningCoffee

    Why so many visits? There are so many good coffee shops around, why settle for sub-par at best?

  • Warrior Two

    Not a lot of decent coffee houses in this city, especially southwest of University.

  • EarlyMorningCoffee

    You need to explore this city a little more.

  • NonNimby

    Mokka is good and I doubt they will suffer from the competition. Those who are afraid to compete should not be in the game, If you want the best cappuccino in South Berkeley try Alchemy on Adeline. Nothing else is close.

  • guest

    I think they should replace the ZAB with a “The Voice” style format. Local celebs (Country Joe, Alice Waters, Lil’ Bobby Reich, etc.) would rate performances by applicants and 900 number vote would raise money for city staff parties.

  • guest

    Why not offer a suggestion instead of making a snooty comment?

  • bisphenol

    My two favorites, one SW of University. Both know how to make good coffee.

    Local 123


  • bisphenol

    Starbucks sells milkshakes. F’em, let them compete on merits. People who are heading to Starbucks are heading to Starbucks. Mokka just needs to be on their toes and they will do fine. If their coffee sucks, now is the time to get good at it.

  • bswp

    Sad to see the framing devolve into a Mokka vs. Starbucks story. The City was wrong to grant a permit for such a large coffeeshop at that location without the required parking spaces. It matters not who the tenant is, if the permitted use is inconsistent with city zoning requirements and incompatible with an intersection and neighborhoods already straining under the effects of traffic and parking congestion. And the ZAB itself should be ashamed for its rude treatment of the public at Thursday’s hearing. They should rule on the facts and merits of the issue, not on whether the acting chairman’s opinion that Starbucks makes great coffee.

  • guest

    Good move ZAB. I’m sick of be governed by any 30 odd folks who can fill those rickety wooden chairs.

  • BrianY

    Seems like there are some quotes missing in the sentence that begins, ‘A spokesperson for Starbucks, Danny Cowan, said this action was taken to share details of our proposed store…’

    Unless B-side is a silent partner in this new effort? Full disclosure!!!

  • EBGuy

    Save Mudrakers Cafe…

  • Sylvio

    My friends live around the corner, we would meet there before biking.

  • Sylvio

    May I suggest Lindgren’s on Dwight and Shattuck, their espresso drinks (and brunch, and terrace) are heavenly.

    Also, Alchemy Collective on Adeline and MLK serves amazing coffee and espresso.


  • Sylvio

    Ah yes, SW of University. I second the suggestion for Local 123 and Bartavelle, both are very good.

  • ebv

    That corner is already to congested and it’s not fair to the already near by coffee shops in the area. Starbuck! please don’t be so greedy!

  • Halcyon walker

    I own a condo nearby and walk everywhere and, although I have no love for Starbucks, I will feel safer having a busy retail spot here when I walk alone. Sorry, but is is clearly a net gain for the neighborhood.

  • Aaron Priven

    The City is wrong to have parking requirements at all for this sort of business.

  • quick serve parking rules

    By ordinance, the city automatically waives parking requirements for “this sort of business” unless there is a finding such as serious detriment to the neighborhood. Whether there should be such a finding will be decided at the public hearing. The public hearing will occur because of the overwhelming amount of neighborhood and general public opposition to the permits.

  • dogpark

    Yes. Like what some people said below, it will ultimately depend on who makes the best coffee and has the best customer service. Mokka’s coffee has always been good, better than Starbuck’s in my opinion. With that said, I look forward to this new store. More people in the streets = less scary streets, especially muggings. More people out and about will create a better environment for South Berkeley (Mokka closes too early). I was mugged with a gun to my head walking from Bart last December because the streets were practically empty and not enough people around. With more foot traffic at night, I feel that it would make streets more inviting. I think both stores will thrive, Starbucks because of its popularity and Mokka because of its superior coffee.